You are here:

Education Applications of 3D Technology PROCEEDING

, , , Florida Atlantic University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


Online learning has become an integral part of higher education. Although it is an extension of distance learning, the medium requires new modes of presentation and interaction to ensure high quality and student motivation. Virtual Reality (VR) has the potential to make distance learning truly interactive and flexible similar to the traditional face-to-face courses within a single platform. Students can interact with teachers and other fellow students and can perform experiments that bring the content to life. The virtual game-based experiment gives a better understanding of the subject matter, increases students’ motivation and improves the attention level of the student. Providing appropriate VR technique for a particular educational requirement is challenging. This paper discusses the most common available virtual reality techniques used for educational purposes, and their implications. Different VR examples will help educators decide which techniques are best suited to their subject matter and pedagogical needs.


Ghosh, A., Brown, V. & Huang, S. (2018). Education Applications of 3D Technology. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 426-436). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 19, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Bamford, A. (2011). LiFE: Learning in future education. Evaluation of Innovations in Emerging Learning Technologies, in the press.
  2. Gamper, H. (2014). Enabling technologies for audio augmented reality systems. Aalto University Publication Series, doctoral dissertations. Retrieved from Gerard, B.
  3. Hand, C. (1997). A survey of 3Dinteraction techniques. Computer Graphics Forum, 16 (5), 269–281.
  4. Heim, S. (2007). The resonant Interface: HCI foundations for interaction design. Addison-Wesley.
  5. Hempel, J. (2015, January 21). Project HoloLens: Our exclusive hands-on with Microsoft’s holographic goggles. Retrieved from Hwang, J., Jung, J., Yim, S., Cheon, J., Lee, S., Choi, S., Kim, G.J. (2006).
  6. Milgram, P., Takemura H., Utsumi A., Kishino F. (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies. 2351–34.
  7. Muhanna, A.M. (2015). Virtual reality and the CAVE: Taxonomy, interaction challenges, and research directions. Journal of King Saud University– Computer and Information Sciences 27, 344–361.
  8. Ng, P.K., Tan, Y.G. (2011). ARTransform: Visualization of three-dimensional geometric transformations in augmented reality environment. WorldComp Proceedings. Retrieved from
  9. Odom, J. (2017). Samsung's 'monitorless' remote desktop smart glasses blur the line between virtual& Augmented reality. Retrieved from
  10. Sherman, W.R., Craig, A.B. (2003). Understanding virtual reality: Interface, application, and design, Publishers. Morgan Kaufmann
  11. Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision. Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 128, 371-394.
  12. Youngblut, C. (1998). Educational Uses of Virtual Reality Technology. Institute for Defense Analyses.
  13. Wu, H.K., Lee, S.W.Y., Chang, H.Y., & Liang, J.C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers& Education, 62, 41-49.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact