You are here:

Impact of After-School Learning Programs on High School Girls’ Confidence and Interest in Computing

, , , , , Michigan State University, United States ; , ChickTech, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


Despite increasing numbers of jobs and degrees, and the growth in interest in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM), the gender gap in these disciplines has not markedly improved. This STEM gender gap is more prominent in the field of Computer Science (CS). In the United States, only 26% of the CS professionals are women. At the secondary school level, only 23.2% of AP computer science test-takers in 2016 were girls. To address the persistent gender gaps in computer science, it is important to understand how we can engage more girls in computing. Co-educational environments where female students are underrepresented pose a risk to their sense of self-efficacy, belonging, and teacher bias in interacting with male students. Research on single-gender environments has proved successful in addressing gender inequity. Additionally, after-school programs provide instructors with flexibility in how the curriculum is structured and delivered to students, presenting opportunities to teachers to use gender-neutral language and providing student agency in project design. This study examined the influence of an all-girls after-school computing program on girls' confidence and interest in pursuing technology-related activities. Results show that engaging girls in computing activities increase their intentions to pursue technology majors and careers. We discuss implications of the findings and future directions for researchers and educators.


Mehta, S., Good, J., Sands, P., Yadav, A., Gretter, S. & Levenhagen-Seeley, J. (2018). Impact of After-School Learning Programs on High School Girls’ Confidence and Interest in Computing. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 372-378). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Sax, L.J., Lehman, K.J., Jacobs, J.A., Kanny, M.A., Lim, G., Monje-Paulson, L., & Zimmerman, H.B. (2017). Anatomy of an enduring gender gap: The evolution of women’s participation in computer science. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(2), 258-293.
  2. Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C.S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(4), 700.
  3. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V.C., Davies, P.G., & Steele, C.M. (2009). Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of personality and social psychology, 97(6), 1045.
  4. Voyles, M.M., Fossum, T., & Haller, S. (2008). Teachers respond functionally to student gender differences in a technology course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 322-345.
  5. Brady, C., Orton, K., Weintrop, D., Anton, G., Rodriguez, S., & Wilensky, U. (2017). All Roads Lead to Computing: Making, Participatory Simulations, and Social Computing as Pathways to Computer Science. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(1), 59-66.
  6. Margolis, J., Ryoo, J.J., Sandoval, C.D., Lee, C., Goode, J., & Chapman, G. (2012). Beyond access: Broadening participation in high school computer science. ACM Inroads, 3(4), 72-78.
  7. Kafai, Y.B., & Burke, Q. (2014, May). Beyond game design for broadening participation: Building new clubhouses of computing for girls. In Proceedings of Gender and IT Appropriation. Science and Practice on DialogueForum for Interdisciplinary Exchange. (P. 21-28). European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies.
  8. Sadler, P.M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411-427.
  9. Yardi, S., & Bruckman, A. (2007, September). What is computing?: bridging the gap between teenagers' perceptions and graduate students' experiences. In Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research (P. 39-50). ACM.
  10. Abbiss, J. (2009). Gendering the ICT curriculum: The paradox of choice. Computers& Education, 53(2), 343-354.
  11. [13] Dee, T., & Gershenson, S. (2017). Unconscious Bias in the Classroom: Evidence and Opportunities. Retrieved from Margolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. (2002). Caring about connections: Gender and computing. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science.
  12. Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A.N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424.
  13. McIlwee, J.S., & Robinson, J.G. (1992). Women in engineering: Gender, power, and workplace culture. SUNY Press. Google Inc. & Gallup Inc. (2015). Images of computer science: perceptions among students, parents and educators in the US. Retrieved from Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R., & Greenwald, A.G. (2002). E research: Ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161-176.
  14. Faulkner, W., & Lie, M. (2007). Gender in the information society: Strategies of inclusion. Gender, Technology and Development, 11(2), 157-177.
  15. Turkle, S. (1984). Les enfants de l'ordinateur. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  16. Lagesen, V.A. (2007). The strength of numbers: Strategies to include women into computer science. Social Studies of Science, 37(1), 67-92.
  17. Clegg, S. (2001). Theorizing the Machine: Gender, Education and Computing. In «Gender and Education», vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 307-324
  18. Friend, M. (2015). Middle school girls’ envisioned future in computing. Computer Science Education, 25(2), 152173.
  19. Franklin, D. (2013). A practical guide to gender diversity for computer science faculty. Synthesis Lectures on Professionalism and Career Advancement for Scientists and Engineers, 1(2), 1-81.
  20. Buffum, P.S., Frankosky, M., Boyer, K.E., Wiebe, E.N., Mott, B.W., & Lester, J.C. (2016). Collaboration and Gender Equity in Game-Based Learning for Middle School Computer Science. Computing in Science& Engineering, 18(2), 18-28.
  21. Denner, J., Werner, L., & Ortiz, E. (2012). Computer games created by middle school girls: Can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts?. Computers& Education, 58(1), 240-249.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact