You are here:

Supporting prospective secondary mathematics teachers in creating instructional explanations through video based experience
article

, University of New Hampshire, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 26, Number 1, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Explaining is one of the fundamental teaching practices. Yet, much is still unknown about the ways is which pre-service secondary teachers (PSTs) learn to create instructional explanations. Even less is known about how technology can support PSTs in this process. This paper describes an instructional module which used video to enhance PSTs’ knowledge of what a ‘good’ instructional explanation entails, and how to create one. In the module, implemented in a secondary methods course, PSTs first analyzed two video-based examples of instructional explanations from the web, and then created their own video explaining a concept or a proposition. PSTs analyzed all three videos, including their own, using the same rubric. In this paper, I describe the design and purposes of the module, discuss aspects of PSTs’ explanations and examine the role of technology in developing PSTs’ practice of creating instructional explanations.

Citation

Buchbinder, O. (2018). Supporting prospective secondary mathematics teachers in creating instructional explanations through video based experience. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 26(1), 33-56. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 3, 2021 from .

© 2018 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Ball, D.L., & Forzani, F.M. (2010). Teaching skillful teaching. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 40-45.
  2. Ball, D.L., Shaughnessy M., & Garcia, N. (2017). Reconsidering video as a tool to support teacher learning. Annual Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators Conference, Orlando, FL. Accessible from: http://www.teachingworks.org/publications_presentations
  3. Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C.A., Underhill, R.G., Jones, D., & Agard, P.C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 194-222.
  4. Brodie, K. (2014). Learning about learner errors in professional learning communities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 221-239.
  5. Buchbinder, O., & Cook, A. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ construction of algebraic proof through exploration of math-tricks. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.). Proceedings of the 9th Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education, (pp.100-106) Prague, Czech Republic. Https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01280547/
  6. Charalambous, C.Y., Hill, H.C., & Ball, D.L. (2011). Prospective teachers’ learning to provide instructional explanations: How does it look and what might it take? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(6), 441-463.
  7. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103 (6), 1013-1055.
  8. Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273-289.
  9. Herbst, P. (2011). Explaining concepts and propositions: A decomposition of practice. Deep Blue at The University of Michigan. Http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/84658.
  10. Hall, R. (2000). Videorecording as theory. In A. Kelly& R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 647–
  11. Howell, H., Lai, Y., Phelps, G., & Croft, A. (2016). Assessing Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Beyond Conventional Mathematical Knowledge: Do Elementary Models Extend? Available online: doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14058.31680(Accessedon 27 October 2016) Supporting Prospective Secondary Mathematics Teachers structional explanations in pre-service teacher training. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(1), 47-60.
  12. Kinach, B.M. (2002). Understanding and learning-to-explain by representing mathematics: epistemological dilemmas facing teacher educators in the secondary mathematics “methods” course. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(2), 153-186.
  13. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Inc.
  14. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  15. Leinhardt, G. (1989). Math lessons: A contrast of novice and expert competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 52-75.
  16. Leinhardt, G. (2001). Instructional explanations: A commonplace for teaching and location for contrast. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 333-357). Washington, DC: American Educational
  17. Leinhardt, G., & Steele, M.D. (2005). Seeing the complexity of standing to the side: Instructional dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 87-163.
  18. Lobato, J., Clarke, D., & Ellis, A.B. (2005). Initiating and eliciting in teaching: A reformulation of telling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 101-136.
  19. Sato, M. (2014). What is the underlying conception of teaching of the edTPA? Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 421-434.
  20. Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM—The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 43(1), 133–145
  21. Star, J.R., & Strickland, S.K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107-125.
  22. TeachingWorks (2012). High-leverage practices. School of Education, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI: Author. Retrieved from http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-practices. Accessed on October 5, 2017.
  23. Thompson, P.W., & Thompson, A.G. (1994). Talking about rates conceptually, Part I: A teacher’s struggle. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(3), 279-303.
  24. Zodik, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Characteristics of teachers’ choice of examples in and for the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 165-182.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections