You are here:

Outcomes from Technology Enhanced Informal Learning Activities: Total Solar Eclipse
PROCEEDING

, , , , , , , University of North Texas, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Washington, DC ISBN 978-1-939797-29-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

Sixth grade students participating in a four-hour hands-on technology enriched space science camp showed significant gains in their understanding of topics related to heliophysics and the solar eclipse. The average number of items correct increased from 3.80 on the pretest to 5.40 on the post test, after each student completed three activities in a round-robin manner: 1) developing a string model of part of the solar systems, 2) completing 2D and 3D printing, and 3) viewing virtual reality video segments. Differences by gender showed that girls’ pre-post gains were significant.

Citation

Christensen, R., Knezek, G., Darby, D., Den Lepcha, S., Jiang, B., Kuo, A. & Wu, A. (2017). Outcomes from Technology Enhanced Informal Learning Activities: Total Solar Eclipse. In J. Johnston (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2017 (pp. 1064-1071). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 9, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Adams Becker, S., Freeman, A., Giesinger Hall, C., Cummins, M., & Yuhnke, B. (2016). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2016 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  2. Azuma, R.T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355385.
  3. Barab, S.A., Hay, K.E., Barnett, M., & Keating, T. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of research in science teaching, 37(7), 719-756.
  4. Brill, J.M., & Park, Y. (2008). Facilitating engaged learning in the interaction age: Taking a pedagogicallydisciplined approach to innovation with emergent technologies. International Journal of Teaching& Learning in Higher Education 20(1), 70-78.
  5. Fracknoi, A., & Schatz, D. (2016). All-American total solar eclipse. National Science Teachers Association: Solar Science, 1-8.
  6. Huang, T.C., & Lin, C.Y. (2017). From 3D modeling to 3D printing: Development of a differentiated spatial ability teaching model. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 604-613.
  7. Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during and after a visit to the UK National Spaced Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 5383.
  8. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of communication, 42(4), 73-93.
  9. Van Schaik, P., Martin, S., & Vallance, M. (2012). Measuring flow experience in an immersive virtual environment for collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 350-365.
  10. Zimmerman, L., Spillane, S., Reiff, P., & Sumners, C. (2014). Comparison of student learning about space in immersive and computer environments. Journal and Review of Astronomy Education and Outreach, (1), A5A20. Acknowledgement

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Capitalizing on Informal Learning Opportunities to Enhance Formal Learning in Classroom Environments

    Gerald Knezek & Rhonda Christensen, University of North Texas, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2018 (Mar 26, 2018) pp. 1920–1926

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.