You are here:

Open Educational Practice and Preservice Teacher Education: Understanding past practice and future possibilities
PROCEEDING

, , University of Southern Queensland, Australia ; , Griffith University, Australia ; , University of Southern Queensland, Australia

AACE Award

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, TX, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-27-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

'Open' is a commonly applied descriptor for a variety of educational initiatives but its meaning and implications vary widely. This paper reviews some more recent understandings of 'open' in education and what that could mean for teacher education. Frameworks for understanding open educational practice are reviewed and past and present practices used in example teacher education courses are evaluated against these frameworks to develop understanding of how selected practices match the characteristics of openness. Directions for future development of open educational practice in teacher education are proposed.

Citation

Albion, P., Jones, D., Campbell, C. & Jones, J. (2017). Open Educational Practice and Preservice Teacher Education: Understanding past practice and future possibilities. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 798-806). Austin, TX, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 22, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. ACARA. (2015). Australian Curriculum: Technologies. Canberra: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/technologies/. Albion, P.R. (2012). Designing for explicit TPACK development: Evolution of a preservice design and technology course. In P. Resta& R. Rose (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 2680-2685). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education
  2. Albion, P.R. (2014). From creation to curation: Evolution of an authentic 'Assessment for Learning' task. In L. Liu, D. Gibson, V. Brown, T. Cavanaugh, J. Lee, C. Maddux, M. Ochoa, M. Ohlson, D. Slykhuis& J. Voogt (Eds.), Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2014 (pp. 69-78). Waynesville, NC: AACE.
  3. Becker, H.J., & Riel, M.M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructivist-compatible computer use. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2g9Bhsf Belland, B.R. (2009). Using the theory of habitus to move beyond the study of barriers to technology integration. Computers& Education, 52(2), 353-364. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2008.09.004
  4. Berry, B., Daughtrey, A., & Wieder, A. (2010). A better system for schools: Developing, supporting and retaining effective teachers. Hillsborough, NC: Center for Teaching Quality.
  5. Bigum, C., & Rowan, L. (2014). Ladders, learning and lessons from Charlie: exploring the potential of public click pedagogy. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning, Edinburgh. Retrieved from http://chrisbigum.com/downloads/LLL-PCP.pdf Conole, G. (2012). Fostering social inclusion through open educational resources (OER). Distance Education, 33(2), 131-134.
  6. De Hei, M., Strijbos, J.-W., Sjoer, E., & Admiraal, W. (2016). Thematic review of approaches to design group learning activities in higher education: The development of a comprehensive framework. Educational Research Review, 18, 33-45. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.edurev.2016.01.001Ehlers,U.-D.(2011).Fromopen educational resources to open educational practices. ELearning Papers (23). Erickson, J.A., & Anderson, J.B. (Eds.). (1997). Learning with the community: Concepts and models for service-learning in teacher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
  7. Hargreaves, A. (2010). Presentism, individualism, and conservatism: The legacy of Dan Lortie's Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 143-154.
  8. Jarche, H. (2012). PKM as pre-curation. Retrieved from http://jarche.com/2012/07/pkm-as-pre-curation/ Jones, J.K. (2012). Weaving the threads of time: Narrative methods in participatory research. In P.A. Danaher, L.R. De GeorgeWalker, R.W. Henderson, K.J. Matthews, W.J. Midgley, K. Noble, M.A. Tyler, C.H. Arden & M. Cameron (Eds.), Constructing capacities: Building capabilities through learning and engagement. (pp. 218-239). Newcastle Upon Tyne,
  9. Kehoe, A., & Goudzwaard, M. (2015). EPortfolios, badges, and the whole digital self: How evidence-based learning pedagogies and technologies can support integrative learning and identity development. Theory Into Practice, 54(4), 343-351.
  10. Lortie, D.C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  11. Pomerantz, J., & Peek, R. (2016). Fifty shades of open. First Monday, 21(5).
  12. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Relate-Create-Donate: a teaching/learning philosophy for the cyber-generation. Computers& Education, 31(1), 25-39. Doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(98)00014-1
  13. Stagg, A. (2014). OER adoption: a continuum for practice. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 11 (3), 152-165. Doi:10.7238/rusc.v11i3.2102D.(2010).OpenEducation and the Future, https://youtu.be/Rb0syrgsH6M

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides