You are here:

Practice What We Preach: A Revision of an Online Teaching Certification Program
PROCEEDING

, , St. Mary's University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, TX, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-27-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Online learning is taking higher education by storm, but are faculty ready for this approach to teaching? In this case, ready means the professor is up-to-date on effective online teaching methods and pedagogical strategies, cognizant of and responsive to online accessibility guidelines, knowledgeable of the basic tools, and competent in their application to make effective use of their learning management system (LMS). In most cases, the answer is “No". The poster describes the process of revising an online teaching certification program (OTCP) course to improve faculty readiness for effective online instruction. A priority of the course revision was to “practice what we preach," by means of presenting a training program that upheld the same standards and guidelines expected of faculty in the development of their online courses.

Citation

Cruz, F. & Cody, T. (2017). Practice What We Preach: A Revision of an Online Teaching Certification Program. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 493-498). Austin, TX, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 27, 2021 from .

© 2017 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011, Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/goingthedistance.pdf.
  2. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States, 2016, Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf.
  3. Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on ELearning, 7(1), 5-22.
  4. Bartley, S.J., & Golek, J.H. (2004). Evaluating the cost effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. Educational Technology& Society, 7(4), 167-175. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/7_4/16.pdf. Bonner, J. (1998). Implications of cognitive theory for instructional design. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 36(1), 4-14.
  5. Chen, B., & Noyelles, A. (2013). Exploring students’ mobile learning practices in higher education. Educause Review Online. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/10/exploring-students-mobile-learning-practices-in-higher-education. De Gane, J.C., & McGill, B.A. (2010) Faculty development in online education. Journal of Online Higher Education, 1(7). Retrieved from http://www.theelearninginstitute.org/journal_pdf/JOHE%20-%20Faculty%20Development%20in%20Online
  6. Georgina, D.A., & Hosford, C.C. (2009). Higher education faculty perceptions on technology integration and training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 690–696.
  7. Herman, J.H. (2012). Faculty development programs: The frequency and variety of professional development programs available to online instructors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5), 87-106. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1000093.pdf.Hutchins,H.(2003).Instructionalimmediacyandthesevenprinciples:Strategiesforfacilitatingonlinecourses.OnlineJournalofDistanceLearningAdministration,6(3).Retrievedfromhttp://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/hutchins63.html.
  8. Knowles, M. (1980). What is andragogy?. The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. (pp. 39-59). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge Adult Education.
  9. Lackey, K. (2011). Faculty development: An analysis of current and effective training strategies for preparing faculty to teach online. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(5). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter144/lackey144.html.
  10. Lane, L.M. (2013). An open, online course model to prepare faculty to teach online. Journal of Educators Online, 10(1). Retrieved from http://lisahistory.net/pages/LaneOpenOnlineCourseforFaculty.pdf.
  11. Larson, M.B., & Lockee, B.B. (2014). Mastering the basics. Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design (pp. 119). New York, NY: Routledge.
  12. Maguire, L.L. (2005). Literature review– faculty participation in online distance education: barriers. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1),1-12. Retrieved from http://www.bu.edu/ssw/files/pdf/Literature-Review-Faculty-Participation-inOnline-Distance-Education_-Barr2.pdf
  13. Mandernach, B.J., Forrest, K.D., Babutzke, J.L., & Manker, L.R. (2009). The role of instructor interactivity in promoting critical thinking in online and face-to-face classrooms. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(1). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol5no1/mandernach_0309.pdf. Mandernach, B.J., Mason, T., Forrest, K.D., & Hackathorn, J. (2012) Faculty views on the appropriateness of teaching undergraduate psychology courses online. Teaching of Psychology, 39(3), 203-208.
  14. McQuiggan, C.A. (2012). Faculty development for online teaching as a catalyst for change. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ971044.pdf.
  15. Merriënboer, J.J.G., & Kirschner, P.A. (2013). New approaches to instruction. In Routledge (Ed.), 10 steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design (2nd ed., pp.1-10). New York, NY: Routledge.
  16. Meyer, K. (2004). Evaluating online discussions: Four different frames of analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2). Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/sites/default/files/v8n2_meyer_1.pdf.
  17. Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309-319. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/Vol11no2/Nguyen_0615.pdf.
  18. Perreault, H., Waldman, L., & Alexander, M. (2002). Overcoming barriers to successful delivery of distance-learning courses. Journal of Education for Business, 77(6), 313-319.
  19. Pugsley, L. (2011). How to get to grips with educational theory. Education for Primary Care, 22, 266-268.
  20. Ralston-Berg, P., & Nath, L. (2009). What makes a quality online course? The student perspective. 25th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching& Learning, Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/resource_library/proceedings/09_20471.pdf.
  21. Sandars, J., & Morrison, C. (2009). What is the net generation? The challenge for future medical education. Medical Teacher, 29(2-3), 85-88. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590601176380Schunk,D.(2011).Behaviorism.InPearson (Ed.), Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed., pp. 73-116).
  22. Scott, S.S., McGuire, J.M., & Shaw, S.F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education. Remedial and Special Education, 24(6), 369-380.
  23. Shea, P. (2007). Bridges and barriers to teaching online college courses: A study of experienced online faculty in thirty-six colleges. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 73-128. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/.../v11n2_shea_0.pdf. Song, L., Singleton, E.S., Hill, J.R., & Koh, M.H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59-70. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.iheduc.2003.11.003
  24. Tobin, T.J. (2014). Increase online student retention with universal design. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 15(3), 13–24. Retrieved from http://mathcs.duq.edu/~tobin/cv/QRDE.UDL.Article.pdf.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read