You are here:

ICT Accessibility MOOC: Design and Implementation
PROCEEDING

, , Georgia Institute of Technology, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Washington, DC, United States Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper describes the design and implementation of an ICT Accessibility MOOC at Georgia Tech. The course was designed based on the Continuing and Professional Education Rubric, Second Edition and the experience and expertise of the instructors, instructional designers and staff from three different entities at Georgia Tech. The MOOC not only teaches students about accessibility but is also provided on an accessible platform. The findings show that the course is a success in providing knowledge about accessibility and accessibility solutions in the United States.

Citation

Wirth, F. & Lee, C. (2016). ICT Accessibility MOOC: Design and Implementation. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 58-64). Washington, DC, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 28, 2022 from .

© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Doore, G.S. (2006, April 4). Online courses make education accessible and inexpensive. Christian Science Monitor, P. 8.
  2. Duehren, A.M (2015). EdX settles with Department of Justice. The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved from http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2015/4/3/edX-settles-department-justice/ Genc Kumtepe, E., Ucar, H. & Kumtepe, A.T. (2016). Dialogic and Help Seeking Behaviors of Online Learners: A case of an Online Course. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (pp. 245-247). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of
  3. Girelli, A. (2013). Add a caption and call it accessible? Not so Fast!. New England Journal Of Higher Education, 1.
  4. Linder, K.E., Fontaine-Rainen, D.L., & Behling, K. (2015). Whose job is it? Key challenges and future directions for online accessibility in US institutions of higher education. Open Learning, 30(1), 21-34. Doi: 10 1080/02680513.1007859
  5. Values (2013). In Quality Matters. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/layout-1/download/QMStandards2011-2013.pdf
  6. Taherbhai, F (2005). Help seeking in an online environment. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/ohiou1126299156/inline
  7. Tandy, C., & Meacham, M. (2009). Removing the barriers for students with disabilities: Accessible online and webenhanced courses. Journal of Teaching in Social Work. 29(3). 313-328. Doi:10.1080/08841230903022118

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References