You are here:

Conceptualizing school-based teacher learning from teachers' points of view: Holistically leveraging formal, informal, and independent learning activities
Proceeding

, Virginia Commonwealth University, United States ; , University of Virginia, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-24-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

Improving in-service teacher education is paramount to improving student learning outcomes, and while research in this area typically examines formal teacher learning opportunities, emerging research indicates that teachers also engage in informal and independent modes of learning. Our inquiry into how teachers learned about integrating technology into their instruction highlighted their ability to seamlessly switch among all three modes as their needs required and opportunities allowed, which the literature to date does not capture. We apply the communities of practice theoretical framework to conceptualize a holistic approach to supporting in-service teachers’ learning activities. By identifying the affordances and constraints of these three learning modes we illustrate how the affordances in modes counteract the constraints of the others.

Citation

Jones, M. & Dexter, S. (2016). Conceptualizing school-based teacher learning from teachers' points of view: Holistically leveraging formal, informal, and independent learning activities. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2016--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 935-945). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Alderton, E., Brunsell, E., & Bariexca, D. (2011). The End of Isolation. The Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 1–16.
  2. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.
  3. Barab, S.A., Makinster, J.G., & Scheckler, R. (2003). Designing System Dualities : Characterizing a Web-Supported Professional Development Community. Information Society, 19(3), 237–256.
  4. Colley, H., Hodkinson, P., & Malcolm, J. (2003). Informality and Formality in Learning: a report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre. London. Retrieved from https://www.lsneducation.org.uk/user/order.aspx?code=031492 & Src=XOWEB
  5. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M.W. (2011). Policies That Support Professional Development in an Era of Reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 81–92.
  6. Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324–340.
  7. Duran, M., Brunvard, S., & Fossum, P.R. (2009). Preparing Science Teachers To Teach With Technology: Exploring a K-16 Networked Learning COmmunity Approach. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(4), 21–43.
  8. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal Learning in the Workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273.
  9. Gerard, L.F., Bowyer, J.B., & Linn, M.C. (2010). How Does a Community of Principals Develop Leadership for Technology-Enhanced Science? Journal of School Leadership, 20(March 2010), 145 –.
  10. Higgins, T.E., & Spitulnik, M.W. (2008). Supporting Teachers’ Use of Technology in Science Instruction Through Professional Development: A Literature Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 511–521. Doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9118-2
  11. Hur, J.W., & Brush, T.A. (2009). Teacher Participation in Online Communities: Why Do Teachers Want to Participate in Self-generated Online Communities of K-12 Teachers? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 279–304.
  12. Jones, W.M. & Dexter, S. (2014). How teachers learn: The roles of formal, informal, and independent learning. Educational Technology Research& Development, 62(3), 367-384. Doi:10.1007/s11423014-9337-6
  13. Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 149–170. Doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00101-4
  14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (24th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Lawless, K., & Pellegrino, J. (2007). Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. Doi:10.3102/0034654307309921
  16. Lock, J.V. (2006). A New Image: Online Communities to Facilitate Teacher Professional Development. Development, 14(4), 663–678.
  17. Loving, C.C., Schroeder, C., Kang, R., Shimek, C., & Herbert, B. (2007). Blogs: Enhancing Links in a Professional Learning Community of Science and Mathematics Teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 178–198.
  18. Mackey, J., & Evans, T. (2011). Interconnecting Networks of Practice for Professional Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12.3, 1 – 18.
  19. Marsick, V.J., & Watkins, K.E. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London and New York:Rutledge. Meirink, J.A., Meijer, P.C., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T.C.M. (2009). How do teachers learn in the workplace? An examination of teacher learning activities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 209–224.
  20. Ming, T.S., Wah, L.K., Azman, H., Yean, T.L., & Sim, L.Y. (2010). Grappling with technology: A case of supporting Malaysian Smart School teachers’ professional development The Smart School reform. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 400–416.
  21. Riverin, S., & Stacey, E. (2008). Sustaining an Online Community of Practice: A Case Study. Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 43–58.
  22. Rodrigues, S., Marks, A., & Steel, P. (2003). Developing science and ICT pedagogical content knowledge: a model of continuing professional development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(4), 386–394.
  23. Sawchuk, P.H. (2008). Theories and methods for research on informal learning and work: towards crossfertilization. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(1), 1–16.
  24. Schlager, M.S., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher Professional Development, Technology, and Communities of Practice: Are We Putting the Cart Before the Horse? The Information Society, 19, 203–220.
  25. Vavasseur, C.B., & Macgregor, S.K. (2008). Extending Content-Focused Professional Development through Online Communities of Practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 517–536. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ826089.pdf Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80 – 91. Doi:10.1016/J.tate.2007.01.004
  26. Wenger, E. (1991). Toward a theory of cultural transpareny: elements of a social discourse of the visible and the invisible. University of California at Irvine. Wenger, E. (1998a). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(June 1998), 1–10.
  27. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W.M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.