You are here:

Culturally Responsive Teaching with Technology: Increasing STEM Participation of Underrepresented Groups
PROCEEDING

, , Texas State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper will discuss the US shortage of underrepresented groups in the STEM fields as well as current barriers to the participation of African Americans, Latinos, and women. Culturally responsive teaching practices to increase participation will be presented, and the concept of culturally responsive technologies as a strategy to increase participation will be introduced.

Citation

Delaney, C. & Lee, K.S. (2016). Culturally Responsive Teaching with Technology: Increasing STEM Participation of Underrepresented Groups. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 482-485). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 21, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Aaen, J., & Dalsgaard, C. (2016). Student Facebook groups as a thirdspace: Between social life and schoolwork. Learning, Media And Technology, 41(1), 160-186. Doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1111241
  2. Archer, L., Dewitt, J., Osborne, J., Justin, D., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: Primary schools girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture& Society, 21(1), 171194.
  3. Banks, J.A. (2001). Educating citizens in a multicultural society. New York: Teachers College Press.
  4. Brown, C.S., Alabi, B.O., Huynh, V.W., & Masten, C.L. (2011). Ethnicity and gender in late childhood and early adolescence: Group identity and awareness of bias. Developmental Psychology, 47, 463-471.
  5. Charleston, L.J. (2012). A qualitative investigation of African Americans’ decision to pursue computing science degrees: Implications for cultivating career choice and aspiration. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5(4), 222.
  6. Colwell, R. (2003). Hearing testimony before the Committee on Science Basic Research Subcommittee. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/about/congress/108/rrc_minordigiwiretech070903.jsp
  7. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
  8. Fisher, C.B., Wallace, S.A., & Fenton, R.E. (2000). Discrimination distress during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 679-695.
  9. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching, second edition (Multicultural Education). New York: NY. Teachers College.
  10. Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645-662.
  11. Grossman, J.M., & Porche, M.V. (2014). Perceived gender and racial/ethnic barriers to STEM success. Urban Education, 49, 698-727.
  12. Haddix, M., & Sealey-Ruiz, Y. (2012). Cultivating digital and popular literacies as empowering and emancipatory acts among urban youth. Journal Of Adolescent& Adult Literacy, 56(3), 189-192.
  13. Hammond, Z. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin Press.
  14. Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., & Lange, P.G. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Retrieved from https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/DML_ETHNOG_WHITEPAPER_1.PDF
  15. Kellow, J.T., & Jones, B.D. (2008). The effects of stereotypes on the achievement gap: Reexamining the academic performance of African American high school students. Journal of Black Psychology, 34, 94-120.
  16. Ladson-Billings (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. 2nd edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  17. Ladson-Billings, G. (2011). Is meeting the diverse needs of all students possible? Kappa Delta Pi Record, (Fall), 13-15.
  18. Li, J., Snow, C., & White, C. (2015). Teen culture, technology and literacy instruction: Urban adolescent students' perspectives. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 41(3),
  19. Lucas, R. (2013). Restructuring high school math learning spaces with interactive technology and transformative pedagogy (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (3601712).
  20. Museus, S.D., Palmer, R.T., Davis, R.J., & Maramba, D.C. (2011). Special issue: Racial and ethnic minority students' success in STEM education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 36(6), 1-140.
  21. National Science Foundation (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011. Special Report NSF 11-309. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
  22. National Science Foundation. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (NSF 13-304). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/start.cfm
  23. Noddings, N. (1986). Caring-a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. USA: University of California Press.
  24. Pajares, F. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. In A.M. Gallagher& J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 294-315). New York, NY:
  25. Scott, K.A., Sheridan, K.M., & Clark, K. (2015). Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited. Learning, Media& Technology, 40(4), 412-436. Doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.924966
  26. Steele, J., James, J.B., & Barnett, R.C. (2002). Learning in a man's world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 46-50.
  27. Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., & O'Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143-1179.
  28. U.S. Department of Labor. (2007). The STEM workforce challenge: The role of the public workforce system in a national solution for a competitive science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce. Retrieved from http://www.doleta.gov/youth_services/pdf/STEM_Report_4%2007.pdf
  29. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  30. Vivian, R., Barnes, A., Geer, R., & Wood, D. (2014). The academic journey of university students on Facebook: An analysis of informal academic-related activity over a semester. Research in Learning Technology, 22. Doi:10.3402/rlt.v22.24681.
  31. West-Olatunji, C., Shure, L., Pringle, R., Adams, T., Lewis, D., & Cholewa, B. (2010). Exploring how school counselors position low-income African American girls as mathematics and science learners. Professional School Counseling, 13, 184-195.
  32. Whittaker, A.L., Howarth, G.S., & Lymn. K.A. (2014). Evaluation of Facebook© to create an online learning community in an undergraduate animal science class.” Educational Media International 51(2): 135–145.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.