#
Interactive Whiteboards Research and the Mathematics Classroom: A LearnTechLib Review
PROCEEDING

## Gregory Chamblee, Georgia Southern University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

## Abstract

This paper summarizes Interactive WhiteBoard mathematics-related research published in LearnTechLib.org from 2000 - present. Interactive WhiteBoards (IWBs) continue to be a technology used in the mathematics classroom. Twenty-four publications were found. Findings were most of the research is at the secondary level, subjects are teachers and there are few studies on IWB impact on student achievement. Future research needs are discussed based on these findings.

## Citation

Chamblee, G. (2016). Interactive Whiteboards Research and the Mathematics Classroom: A LearnTechLib Review. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2484-2489). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 23, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/172043/.

© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

### Keywords

## References

View References & Citations Map- Bozkurt, G. & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2011). Factors influencing student teachers’ use of ICT in mathematics teaching. In S. Barton, J. Hedberg& K. Suzuki (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn 2011 (pp. 627-634).
- Bruce, C.D., McPherson, R., Sabeti, F.M. & Flynn, T. (2011). Revealing significant learning moments with interactive whiteboards in mathematics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(4), 433-454.
- Fraser, V. & Garofalo, J. (2015). Novice mathematics teachers’ use of technology to enhance student engagement, questioning, generalization, and conceptual understanding. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 29-51. Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education.
- Gage, J. (2002). So what is an electronic whiteboard? Should you want one? Micromath, 18(2), 5-7.
- Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2003). Players in the management of change: Introducing interactive whiteboards into schools. Management in Education, 17(1), 20-23.
- Hall, J., Chamblee, G. & Slough, S. (2013). An examination of interactive whiteboard perceptions using the Concerns-Based Adoption Model Stages of Concern and the Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow Model of instructional evolution. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(3), 301-320. Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education.
- Hall, J., Chamblee, G. & Slough, S. (2013). An analysis of secondary mathematics teachers’ observed use of interactive whiteboards in the classroom. In R. McBride& M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (pp. 2107-2114).
- Hall, J., Chamblee, G. & Slough, S. (2012). Implications of interactive whiteboards research for the mathematics classrooms. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 4825-4830). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of
- Hall, J. & Chamblee, G. (2010). High school mathematics teachers and interactive whiteboards: A longitudinal study of 2 users and 2 future-users, Year 3. In D. Gibson& B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3440-3447).
- Heemskerk, I., Kuiper, E. & Meijer, J. (2014). Interactive whiteboard and virtual learning environment combined: Effects on mathematics education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 465-478. Wiley.-2488-SITE 2016-Savannah, GA, United States, March 21-26, 2016
- Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351-365.
- Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 227-241.Leendertz, V. & Blignaut, S. (2013). Desire to Move Forward: Barriers to Professional Development of Mathematics Faculty. In J. Herrington, A. Couros& V. Irvine (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2013 (pp. 90-99). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Link, T. (2012). The effect of interactive whiteboard-based instruction on mathematics performance of English learners. Ph.D. Thesis, St. John's University (New York), School of Education and Human Services.
- Lopez, O. & Krockover, C. (2014). Contextual factors relevant to elementary teachers using interactive whiteboards in mathematics classroom discourse. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25(3), 405-426. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston,VA: NCTM.
- Marshall, A.M.S. (2014). Secondary mathematics teachers’ usage of interactive whiteboards: Three digital ways to use this instructional tool. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on ELearning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2014 (pp. 1285-1292).
- McDonald, S. (2012). The challenge to situate digital learning technologies in preservice teacher mathematics education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12(4), 355-368. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Olsen, A., LeMire, S. & Baker, M. (2011). The impact of self-efficacy and peer support on student participation with interactive whiteboards in the middle school math class. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(2), 163-178. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Park, S., Kim, K., Everson, J. & Mushegan, A. (2011). The effect of interactive whiteboards on kindergarten students’ learning: Findings from two case studies. In M. Koehler& P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 1630-1633).
- Rains, C.S. (2011). Effect of interactive whiteboard instruction on 5th grade standardized test scores in the area of mathematics. Ph.D. Thesis, Walden University.
- Sabeti, F.M. (2012). Beyond talking with our hands: The role of gesture in an IWB-mediated mathematics classroom. Master's thesis, York University.
- Sampaio, P. & Coutinho, C. (2013). Teach mathematics with technology: Put into practice a theoretical framework. In R. McBride& M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (pp. 4852-4857). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the
- Serow, P. & Callingham, R. (2011). Levels of use of interactive whiteboard technology in the primary mathematics classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(2), 161-173.
- Taylor, H.L. (2013). Kindergarten perceptions of interactive whiteboard use in mathematics lessons. Master's thesis, Saint Mary's College of California.
- Torff, B. & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students' self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers& Education, 54(2), 379-383.
- Whyburn, L. & Way, J. (2012). Student perceptions of the influence of IWBs on their learning in mathematics. Australian Educational Computing, 27(1), 23-27.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References