Makification: Towards a Framework for Leveraging the Maker Movement in Formal Education
Jonathan Cohen, Georgia State University, United States ; W. Monty Jones, Virginia Commonwealth University, United States ; Shaunna Smith, Texas State University, United States ; Brendan Calandra, Georgia State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
Maker culture is part of a burgeoning movement in which individuals leverage modern digital technologies to produce and share physical artifacts with a broader community. Certain components of the maker movement, if properly leveraged, hold promise for transforming formal education in a variety of contexts. The authors here work towards a framework for leveraging these components (i.e., creation, iteration, sharing, and autonomy) in support of learning.
Cohen, J., Jones, W.M., Smith, S. & Calandra, B. (2016). Makification: Towards a Framework for Leveraging the Maker Movement in Formal Education. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 129-135). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 23, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/171660/.
© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s Constructivism, Papert’s Constructionism: What’s the difference? Constructivism: Uses and Perspectives in Education. Doi:10.1.1.132.4253
- Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The new industrial revolution. New York, NY: Crown.
- Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital Fabrication and “Making” in Education: The Democratization of Invention. In FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors (pp. 1–21). Retrieved from
- Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
- Dougherty, D. (2012). The Maker Movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11–14.
- Gershenfeld, N. (2012). How to make almost anything: The digital fabrication revolution. Foreign Affairs, 91(6), 43–57. Retrieved from http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/138154/neil-gershenfeld/how-to-make-almostanything?page=show
- Halverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495– 505.
- Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Education.
- Kafai, Y.B., Fields, D.H., & Searle, K.A. (2014). Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 532–556.
- Kalil, T. (2010). Innovation, education and Makers. Retrieved from http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/10/innovationeducation-and-the-M.html
- Martin, L. (2015). The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education, 5(1), 30–39.
- Martinez, S., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
- Moorefield-Lang, H.M. (2014). Makers in the library: case studies of 3D printers and makerspaces in library settings. Library Hi Tech, 32(4), 583–593.
- Obama, B. (2014). Remarks by the President at the WhiteHouse Maker Faire. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/06/18/remarks-president-white-house-maker-faire Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Papert, S. (1988). A critique of technocentrism in thinking about the school of the future. In Children in the information age: Opportunities for creativity, innovation and new activities (pp. 3–18). Oxford, UK:
- Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175.
- Savery, J.R. (2006). Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. Doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1002
- Sawyer, R. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Sawyer, R., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81–92.
- Sheridan, K., Halverson, E., Litts, B.K., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: Comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–532.
- Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- West, R., & Hannafin, M. (2011). Learning to design collaboratively: Participation of student designers in a community of innovation. Instructional Science, 39(6), 821–41.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.