You are here:

Adoption of Innovation: The Road to Implementation of a Learning Management System
PROCEEDINGS

, , National University, United States ; , National University, School of Business, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Kona, Hawaii, United States Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

Adoption of innovation and the success of the implementation of that innovation is dependent upon the institution’s ability to address stakeholders’ needs. To prepare for the implementation of a new Learning Management System, full-time and part-time faculty were surveyed regarding their need for technology skills acquisition and for professional development. The study was designed to obtain perceptual data, to obtain a snapshot of current technology skills, and to gather attitudinal data in regards to the future implementation of the new LMS. As a result, an implementation plan was devised on five key findings: 1) application and understanding of adoption of innovation, 2) need for communication with all stakeholders, 3) need to build a learning community, 4) need for regional and school representation through infusion of a coach/mentor model, and 5) the need for marketing and promotion to the institution.

Citation

Sistek-Chandler, C., Myers, M. & Silverstone, S. (2015). Adoption of Innovation: The Road to Implementation of a Learning Management System. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 480-490). Kona, Hawaii, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 9, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2010). Class Differences: Online Education in the United States. Needham, MA: Babson Survey Research Group. Accessed June 6, 2014 at http://sloanconsortium.org/sites/default/files/class_differences.pdf Allen I.E., and Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the Course: Online Education in the United States, 2008, Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2008. Accessed June 6, 2014 at http://sloanconsortium.org/sites/default/files/staying_the_course-2.pdf
  2. Ahmad, A.A. (2013). The efficiency of the "learning management system (LMS)" in AOU, Kuwait, as a communication tool in an E-learning system. The International Journal of Educational Management, 27(2), 157-169. Doi: , D., & Black, E.W. (2012). Communication is key: the role of communication in the diffusion of a learning management system into a higher education environment. International Journal of Learning Technology, 7(1), 4-22.
  3. Benson, R., & Palaskas, T. (2006). Introducing a new learning management system: An institutional case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 548-567.
  4. Black, E.W., Beck, D., Dawson, K., Jinks, S., & DiPietro, M. (2007). The other side of the LMS: Considering implementation and use in the adoption of an LMS in online and blended learning environments. Techtrends: Linking Research& Practice to Improve Learning, 51(2), 35-39. Doi:10.1007/s11528-007-0024-x
  5. Dagada, R., & Mungai, P. (2013). Learning management system implementation framework for higher education-case of university of the Witwatersrand. International Journal of eEducation, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3(2), 151. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJEEEE.2013.V3.212Emelyanova,N., & Voronina, E. (2014). Introducing a learning management system at a Russian university: Students' and teachers' perceptions. International Review of Research in Open& Distance Learning, 15(1), 272-289.
  6. Ge, X., Lubin, I.A., & Zhang, K. (2010). An investigation of faculty’s perceptions and experiences when transitioning to a new learning management system. Knowledge Management& E-Learning: An International Journal (KM & EL), 2(4), 433-447.
  7. Georgouli, K., Skalkidis, I., & Guerreiro, P. (2008). A framework for adopting LMS to introduce e-learning in a traditional course. Journal of Educational Technology& Society, 11(2). Gleanster Research, Compliance Training Solutions. NA, ND. Retrieved from: http://www.gleanster.com/solution/learning-management-systems-for-business Hennessy, S. (2014). Bridging Between Research and Practice: Supporting Professional Development Through Collaborative Studies of Classroom Teaching with Technology. Springer Science& Business Media.
  8. Herman, J. (2012). Faculty development programs: the frequency and variety of professional development programs available to online instructors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5). Accessed June 6, 2014 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1000093.pdf Hightower, T., Murphrey, T., Coppernoll, S., Jahedkar, J., & Dooley, K.E. (2011). An examination of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with the adoption of Moodle by eXtension. Journal of Extension, 49(6), 20.
  9. Hulley, W., & Dier, L. (2005). Harbours of hope: The planning for school and student success process. Bloomington: Solution Tree.
  10. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada,V., Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  11. Keengwe, J., & Georgina, D. (2012). The digital course training workshop for online learning and teaching. Education& Information Technologies, 17(4), 365-379. .
  12. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  13. Ryan, T.G., Toye, M., Charron, K., & Park, G. (2012). Learning management system migration: An analysis of stakeholder perspectives. International Review of Research in Open& Distance Learning, 13(1), 220-237.
  14. Smart, K.A., & Meyer, K.A. (2005). Changing course management systems: Lessons learned. Educause Quarterly, 28(2), 68-70.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides