You are here:

A Strategy to Increase Students’ Motivation and Decrease Dropout Rates on Computer Programming Courses in a Public Institute of Education and Technology
PROCEEDINGS

, The Federal Institute of Education and Technology at at Sertao Pernambucano - IF Sertao-PE, Brazil ; , Hameen University of Applied Sciences - HAMK, Finland ; , The Federal Institute of Education and Technology at Santa Catarina - IFSC, United States ; , Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences, School of Vocational Teacher Education, Finland ; , Hameen University of Applied Sciences - HAMK, Hameenlinna, Finland

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Montreal, Quebec, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-16-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

This paper is a report on a exploratory design research of educational intervention conducted on a public institute of education and technology. The institution of 3,000 students is an important regional educator in Sao Francisco Valley, which is known as one of the poorest areas in Brazil. There are remarkable problems of dropout rates in the school. The educational intervention presented here offers a new strategy to mitigate dropout rates by re-designing teaching of computer programming courses on the basis of a student-centered approach with emphasis on guided participation and project-based learning. The hypothesis is that these methods engage and motivate learners, and empower the learning community to support studying, in a more efficient way.

Citation

Correia, A., Ryymin, E., Pacheco, F., Aarreniemi-Jokipelto, P. & Joyce, B. (2015). A Strategy to Increase Students’ Motivation and Decrease Dropout Rates on Computer Programming Courses in a Public Institute of Education and Technology. In S. Carliner, C. Fulford & N. Ostashewski (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2015--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1171-1176). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 21, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bell, T.C., Witten, I.H., & Fellows, M. (1998). Computer Science Unplugged: Off-line activities and games for all ages. Computer Science Unplugged.
  2. Brazilian Government. (2013). Tribunal de Contas da União. Acórdão 506, Auditoria Operacional… evasão escolar [Operational audit. Must have actions related with dropout problem in the Brazilian Institutes of Education and Technology] in Portuguese.
  3. Brusilovsky, P., Kouchnirenko A., Miller P., Tomek I. (1994) Teaching programming to novices: A review of approaches and tools. In T. Ottman, I. Tomek (eds.) Proc. Of ED-MEDIA’94-World conference on educational multimedia and hypermedia. Vancouver, Canada, June 25-30, 1994. 103-110.
  4. Damiani, O. (2002). Diversification of agriculture and poverty reduction: Effects on small farmers and rural wage workers of the introduction of non-traditional high-value crops in Northeast Brazil. PhD dissertation, MIT. De-La-Fuente-ValentíN, L., Pardo, A., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2013). Addressing drop-out and sustained effort issues with large practical groups using an automated delivery and assessment system. Computers& Education, 61, 33-42.
  5. DeFilippi, J.R. (2001). Introduction: Project-Based Learning, Reflective Practices and Learning. Management Learning, 32 (1),-1175-EdMedia 2015-Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 22-24, 2015 Donna J. Kain. (2003) Teacher-Centered versus Student-Centered: Balancing Constraint and Theory in the Composition Classroom. Pedagogy. Volume 3, Issue 1, pp. 104-108.
  6. Jenkins, T. (2001). The motivation of students of programming. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 53-56). ACM.
  7. Jenkins, T. (2002). On the difficulty of learning to program. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference of the LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 53 – 58).
  8. Kinnunen, P., & Malmi, L. (2006, September). Why students dropout CS1 course? In Proceedings of the second international workshop on Computing education research (pp. 97-108). ACM.
  9. Mascolo, M.F. (2009) Beyond student-centered and teacher-centered pedagogy: Teaching and learning as guided participation. Pedagogy and the Human Sciences, 1, No. 1, pp. 3-27.
  10. Rogoff, B., Turkanis, C.G., & Bartlett, L (2001). Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. New York, N.Y.: Oxford.
  11. SAGE (2014). The Educational Support System from the Federal Institute of Education and Technology at Sertao PE-SAGE.
  12. Schroeder, A., Minocha, S., & Schneider, C. (2010). The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3), 159-174.
  13. Serrano-Cámara, L.M., Paredes-Velasco, M., Alcover, C.M., & Velazquez-Iturbide, J. Á. (2014). An evaluation of students’ motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning of programming concepts. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 499508.
  14. Soland, J., Stecher, B.M., & Hamilton, L.S. (2013). Measuring 21st Century Competencies Guidance for Educators. RAND Corporation. The Asia Society. Global Cities Educational Network.
  15. Tavares J, Brzezinski I, Huet I, Cabral A., Neri D. (2001) Having coffee with professors and students to talk about higher education pedagogy and academic success. In: 24th international HERDSA conference, Newcastle, Australia.
  16. Thinkersmith (2013). Traveling Circuits lesson My Robotic Friends. Http://csedweek.org/ unplugged

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.