You are here:

Transitioning into the Role of Technology Leaders: Building Faculty Capacity for Technology-enhanced Teaching
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , , , Brock University, Canada

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper reports on an ongoing professional development initiative for developing faculty capacity about technology-enhanced teaching. The purpose of this study was to explore how participation in the Phase 2 prepared faculty to take on the role of technology leaders. Qualitative data from four education faculty members were interviews, videotaped workshop presentations, workshop artifacts, and observations. Findings indicated that: 1) the TPACK-based Professional Learning Design Model supported preparation and implementation of workshops, 2) the opportunity to take on leadership roles as a technology workshop facilitator deepened their understanding of how to use tools more effectively in instruction, 3) the pedagogical dialog of the TPLDM workshop model was critical for effective technology professional development, and 4) taking on technology leadership roles as workshop facilitators was perceived as important for promoting faculty capacity for technology-enhanced instruction.

Citation

Jaipal-Jamani, K., Figg, C., Collier, D., Gallagher, T., Winters, K.L. & Ciampa, K. (2015). Transitioning into the Role of Technology Leaders: Building Faculty Capacity for Technology-enhanced Teaching. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3264-3271). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 21, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bai, H., & Lehman, J. (2003). Impact of a professional development project on university faculty members’ perceptions and use of technology. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications,, 2003(1) 1927-1934.
  2. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P.L. Peterson, E. Baker& B. McGaw (Eds.), Third international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7 ed., pp. 548556).
  3. Butler, D.L., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adoption technology for teaching and learning, Educause Quarterly, 25(2), 22-28.
  4. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  5. Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
  6. Figg, C. & Jaipal, K. (2011). Developing a survey from a taxonomy of characteristics for TK, TCK, and TPK to assess teacher candidates’ knowledge of teaching with technology. In M. Koehler& P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 4330-4339). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  7. Figg, C., & Jaipal, K. (2012). TPACK-in-Practice: Developing 21st century teacher knowledge. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 4683-4689). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  8. Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C.D. Maddux, (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009 (pp. 99108).
  9. Jaipal, K., & Figg, C. (2010). Unpacking the “Total PACKage”: Emergent TPACK characteristics from a study of preservice teachers teaching with technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(3), 415-441.
  10. Jaipal, K. & Figg, C. (2011). Exploring Teacher Knowledge and Actions Supporting Technology-Enhanced Teaching in Elementary Schools: Two Approaches by Pre-Service Teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1227-1246.
  11. Jaipal-Jamani, K. & Figg, C. (2015) A Framework for TPACK-in-Practice: Designing Technology Professional Learning Contexts to Develop Teacher Technology Knowledge (TPACK). In Valanides, N. & C. Angeli (Eds.) Exploring, developing, and assessing TPCK (pps. 137-164). New York: Springer Publications.
  12. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  13. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators, 3-29.
  14. Kanaya, T., Light, D., & Culp, K.M. (2005). Factors influencing outcomes from a technology focused professional development program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,37, 313–329.
  15. Lai, K-W. (2008). ICT supporting the learning process: The premise, reality, and promise. In J. Voogt& G. Knezek (Eds), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 215–230).
  16. Matrix, S. (2012). Challenges, opportunities, and new expectations, challenges, opportunities, and new expectations. Academic Matters, (May), 3-6.
  17. Moser, F.Z. (2007). Faculty adoption of educational technology. EDUCAUSE quarterly, 30(1), 66.
  18. Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action research: Living theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides