You are here:

Evaluating distance learning: Quality indicators from a learner's perspective PROCEEDINGS

, , , Iowa State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Higher education institutions have moved from offering selective online courses to providing complete online programs. To maximize the learning potential of distance learners quality indicators should be identified from learners’ perceptions as learners. The aim of this study was to identify quality indicators for student learning outcomes based on data collected from the Master of Science in Agronomy Distance Program at ISU. Since the beginning of the online program, collaboration was developed with the School of Education at ISU, which leads the evaluation processes of the courses and activities offered by the distance program. The program is currently being evaluated for overall quality. Interviews and an online survey were the major instruments employed. Data were collected from students after their final oral defense. The results were evaluated to determine program’s strengths and weaknesses and identify quality indicators in distance learning from a learner’s perspective.

Citation

Valai, A., Crawford, D. & Moore, K. (2015). Evaluating distance learning: Quality indicators from a learner's perspective. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 547-557). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 17, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Fitzpatrick, J., Sanders, J. & Worthen, B. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (4th ed.). New York: Pearson.
  2. Jung, I. (2011). The dimensions of e-learning quality: from the learner’s perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59 (4), 445-464
  3. Shih, C.C. (2000). An overview of the program and Course Design of the Masters of Science in Agronomy Distance education program. International Conference on Computers in education /International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction, November 20-24, 2000, Taipei, Taiwan.
  4. Shih, C.C., Howard, M., & Thompson, A. (2000). Formative Evaluations of a Web-based Master’s Program: Insights for Webbased Course Developers. International Conferences of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher education (SITE), February 8-12, 2000, San Diego, CA.
  5. Shih, C.C, & Thompson, A. (2000). Students use of Learning Strategies in Web-based Courses. International Conference on Computers in education /International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction, November 20-24, 2000, Taipei, Taiwan. Karaman, S.; Kucuk, S.; Aydemir, M. (2014). Evaluation of an online continuing education program from the perspective of new graduate nurses. Nurse Education Today. V 34, 836-841
  6. Kim, M.C, Kozan, K., Kim, W. & Koehler, A. (2013). Technology integration: From implementation to dynamic Scaffolding. In M.G. Moore Handbook of Distance Education (3rd Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge
  7. Klukas, G.M. (2006). Online Student Support services at Wisconsin College and universities (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database.
  8. Meyer, K.A. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on online learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Martinez, R. Liu, S., Watson, W. And Bichelmeyer, B. (2006). EVALUATION OF A WEB-BASED MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAM Lessons Learned From an Online Instructional Design and Technology Program. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(3), 267–283
  9. Morrison, G., Ross, S. & Kemp, J. (2011). Designing Effective Instruction (6th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  10. Rovai, A.P. (2003). A practical framework for evaluating online distance education programs. Internet and Higher Education. 6(2), 109–124.
  11. The Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2000). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. Retrieved September 20,2013 , from http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE/QualityOnTheLine.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides