You are here:

Investigating STEM Teacher Motivation in an Online Community of Practice
PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Minnesota, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper describes a recent research study that sought to understand the motivation of beginning STEM teachers within an online community of practice course. Both quantitative and qualitative measures were used to examine multiple concepts within motivation, and findings suggest that online learners expect clear deadlines and expectations, but that flexibility in these same areas is also desired. Results also suggest that multiple points of peer interaction are essential. Finally, learners expressed that although multiple challenges often prevented the accomplishment of certain tasks, they would not change anything about their effort in the course. This study helps inform the future development of online communities of practice for K-12 teachers, and contributes to online instructional methods in order to create a motivating experience and ultimately improved outcomes for teachers within online community of practice environments.

Citation

North, S. & Ellis, J. (2015). Investigating STEM Teacher Motivation in an Online Community of Practice. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 422-427). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Alderman, M.K. (2008). Motivation for achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
  2. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  3. Chen, K.C. & Jan, S.J. (2010). Autonomy, affiliation, and ability: relative salience of factors that influence online learner motivation and learning outcomes. Knowledge Management& E-Learning: An International Journal, 2(1), 30-50.
  4. Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. ASCD.
  5. Dip Nandi, M.H., Chang, S., & Balbo, S. (2012). Evaluating quality in online asynchronous interactions between students and discussion facilitators. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 684–702.
  6. Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324–340.
  7. Huang, H. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 27-37.
  8. Johnston, A., & Settlage, J. (2008). Framing the professional development of members of the science teacher education community. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(6), 513-521.
  9. Knowles, M. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species, (4th ed). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
  10. Lombardi, M.M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st Century: An overview. (D.G. Oblinger, Ed.) (pp. 1–12). EDUCAUSE
  11. McFadden, J., Ellis, J., Anwar, T., & Roehrig, G. (2014). Beginning Science Teachers’ Use of a Digital Video Annotation Tool to Promote Reflective Practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 458-470.
  12. McMillan, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York, NY: Longman. Molphy, M., Pocknee, C. & Young, T, (2007). Online communities of practice: Are they principled and how do they work?, In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007.
  13. Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (2005, August). Online learning communities revisited. In 21st Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning.
  14. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
  15. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education, (5th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  16. Smith, T.M. & Ingersoll, R.M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714.
  17. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker. Http://www.co-il.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/lss.shtml. Accessed October 23, 2014.
  18. Wenger, E., McDermott, R.A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Press.
  19. Xuereb, S. (2014). Why students consider terminating their studies and what convinces them to stay. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(2), 145-156.
  20. Zimmerman, B.J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.