You are here:

Investigating the Potential of MOOCs in K-12 Teaching and Learning Environments ARTICLE

, , , , Kent State University, United States

Journal of Online Learning Research Volume 1, Number 1, ISSN 2374-1473 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

The massive open online course (MOOC) is a relatively new concept in K-12 teaching and learning environments. Although significant work has been done with MOOCs since 2008, it has only been recently that MOOCs have been studied with K-12 populations. The purpose of this study was to further examine the motivation of K-12 students enrolled in a MOOC about teaching in the 21st century. This article provides both quantitative and qualitative evidence that suggests MOOCs can be effectively integrated with high school students. The paper concludes with a discussion of the potential value of using MOOCs and other technologies to provide experiences to students they might not currently have in traditional, blended, or online environments.

Citation

Nigh, J., Pytash, K.E., Ferdig, R.E. & Merchant, W. (2015). Investigating the Potential of MOOCs in K-12 Teaching and Learning Environments. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 85-106. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 14, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bruning, R.H., Schraw, G.J., & Norby, M.M. (2011). Cognitive psychology and instruction (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  2. Deci, E.L., Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., & Ryan, R.M. (2011). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325346.
  3. Entwistle, N.J., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environments: Concepts, measures, and preliminary findings. Occasional Report #1, ETL Project. Edinburgh, UK: Universities of Edinburgh, Coventry, and Durham.
  4. Ferdig, R.E., Roehler, L., Pearson, P.D. (2002). Scaffolding preservice teacher learning through web-based discussion forums: An examination of online conversations in the Reading Classroom Explorer. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(3), 87-94.
  5. Ferdig, R.E. (2010). Understanding the role and applicability of K-12 online learning to support student dropout recovery efforts. Lansing, MI: Michigan Virtual University. Retrieved from: http://www.mivu.org/Portals/0/RPT_RetentionFinal.pdf Ferdig, R.E., Cavanaugh, C., & Freidhoff, J. (2012). Lessons learned from blended programs: Experiences and recommendations from the field. Vienna, VA: International Association for K-12 Online Learning.
  6. Ferdig, R.E. (2013). What massive open online courses have to offer K–12 teachers and students. Lansing, MI: Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute. Retrieved from: http://media.mivu.org/institute/pdf/mooc_report.pdf Ferdig, R.E., Pytash, K.E., Merchant, W., & Nigh, J. (2014). Findings and reflections from the K-12 teaching in the 21st century MOOC. Lansing, MI: Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute. Retrieved from http://media.mivu.org/institute/pdf/
  7. Horn, M.B., & Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K–12 blended learning. Innosight Institute. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/The-rise-of-K-12-blended-learning.pdf
  8. Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Third Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, (pp. 170-180).
  9. Kizilgunes, B., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students’epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 243-255.
  10. Kop, R. & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/523/1103 Mackness, J., Waite, M., Roberts, G., & Lovegrove, E. (2013). Connectivist MOOC: Pedagogical issues and implications for higher education. The International Review of
  11. Rau, P.L.P, Gao, Q., & Wu, L.M. (2008). Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers& Education, 50, 1-22.
  12. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology& Distance Learning. Retrieved from: http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htmSiemens,G.(2008).Connectivism:Alearningtheoryfortoday’slearner,website.Retrievedfrom:http://www.connectivism.ca/about.html
  13. Spinath, B., Eckert, C., & Steinmayr, R. (2014). Gender differences in school success. What are the roles of students’ intelligence, personality and motivation? Educational Research, 56(2), 230-243.
  14. Tschofen, C. & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1143/2086 Yeager, C., Hurley-Dasgupta, B., & Bliss, C.A. (2013). CMOOCS and global learning: An

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.