You are here:

I CARE 2.0: Facilitating online learning in higher education
PROCEEDINGS

, University of Minnesota, United States

  • Full Text
  • Citation
  • Save to Collections
  • E-mail
  • Share
  • OpenURL

    • E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in New Orleans, LA, USA ISBN 978-1-939797-12-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

    Abstract

    Hoffman & Ritchie’s (1998) I CARE model helps facilitators think about the way they design their online courses and interact with learners. The five-step model affords organization to a dynamic online environment, which is helpful for novice and seasoned online instructors and learners. The I CARE model is customized with constructivist approaches and integrated with contemporary social learning technologies in a weekly class agenda format. The instructor (I) introduces the content with a video and sets the context for the lesson. Learners © connect to their prior knowledge and (A) apply new knowledge through personalized active learning and authentic assessments. Students ® reflect on the lesson topic. Learning is (E) extended through an evaluation of the experience or through a guided micro-blog activity. Theories, examples, and options for customization are discussed.

    Citation

    Kennedy, J. (2014). I CARE 2.0: Facilitating online learning in higher education. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 968-971). New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 20, 2019 from .

    © 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

    Keywords

    View References & Citations Map

    References

    1. Anderson, T. (2012). Networks, web 2.0, and the connected learner. In R.A. Reiser& J.V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
    2. Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    4. Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    5. Brophy, J.E. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
    6. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
    7. Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon& Schuster with Kappa Delta Pi (Original work published 1938).
    8. Dewey, J. (2000). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education: Project Gutenberg NetLibrary. (Original work published 1916)
    9. Hoffman, B., & Ritchie, D.C. (1998). Teaching and learning online: Tools, templates, and training. Technology and Teacher Educational Annual, Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
    10. Knowles, M.S. (1989). The making of an adult educator: An autobiographical journey (1st ed.. Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    11. Knowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
    12. Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 2238).

    These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

    Also Read

    Related Collections