You are here:

I CARE 2.0: Facilitating online learning in higher education
PROCEEDINGS

, University of Minnesota, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in New Orleans, LA, USA ISBN 978-1-939797-12-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

Hoffman & Ritchie’s (1998) I CARE model helps facilitators think about the way they design their online courses and interact with learners. The five-step model affords organization to a dynamic online environment, which is helpful for novice and seasoned online instructors and learners. The I CARE model is customized with constructivist approaches and integrated with contemporary social learning technologies in a weekly class agenda format. The instructor (I) introduces the content with a video and sets the context for the lesson. Learners (C) connect to their prior knowledge and (A) apply new knowledge through personalized active learning and authentic assessments. Students (R) reflect on the lesson topic. Learning is (E) extended through an evaluation of the experience or through a guided micro-blog activity. Theories, examples, and options for customization are discussed.

Citation

Kennedy, J. (2014). I CARE 2.0: Facilitating online learning in higher education. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 968-971). New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 25, 2020 from .

© 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Anderson, T. (2012). Networks, web 2.0, and the connected learner. In R.A. Reiser& J.V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  2. Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Brophy, J.E. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  6. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
  7. Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon& Schuster with Kappa Delta Pi (Original work published 1938).
  8. Dewey, J. (2000). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education: Project Gutenberg NetLibrary. (Original work published 1916)
  9. Hoffman, B., & Ritchie, D.C. (1998). Teaching and learning online: Tools, templates, and training. Technology and Teacher Educational Annual, Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  10. Knowles, M.S. (1989). The making of an adult educator: An autobiographical journey (1st ed.. Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  11. Knowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
  12. Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 2238).

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read