You are here:

Reconciliation of Pedagogical Objectives, Technical Opportunities and Stereotypes of Educational Application: Case Perioperative Nursing
PROCEEDINGS

, , Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Jyväskylä, Finland ; , Agora Center, University of Jyväskylä, Finland

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in New Orleans, LA, USA ISBN 978-1-939797-12-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

In the design of educational applications, expertise in several fields is needed: pedagogy, technology and interaction design, among others. Since the aim of an educational application is to promote learning, there should be a clear hierarchy in the perspectives: pedagogical objectives should be the primary perspective, while others play merely an instrumental role. However, it appears that pedagogy is rarely seen as a separate area of expertise. Learning is considered a mundane concept that most people understand. This setting may cause conflicts within a design group. In this paper we present a typical case study, in which pedagogical expertise was overlooked. The resulting application was primitive, in terms of actual learning objectives. Despite this pedagogical failure, the members of the group who were not experts in pedagogy, found the application appropriate for the intended educational use. In a concise user study, the participants were astonishingly satisfied as well. We conclude that the halo around computer technology is still so strong, that it easily overrides obvious flaws in design.

Citation

Pirhonen, A., Koskelainen, T. & Silvennoinen, M. (2014). Reconciliation of Pedagogical Objectives, Technical Opportunities and Stereotypes of Educational Application: Case Perioperative Nursing. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 1593-1602). New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 10, 2022 from .

© 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Baid, H. And Lambert, N. (2010). Enjoyable learning: The role of humour, games, and fun activities in nursing and midwifery education. Nurse Education Today 30(6), pp. 548-552.
  2. Benbasat, I. And Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(4), pp. 211-218.
  3. Clark, R., & Sugrue, B.M. (1988). Research on instructional media, 1978-1988. In D.P. Ely, B. Broadbent, and R.K. Wood (Eds), Educational media and technology yearbook, 14. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, pp. 1936.
  4. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319–340.
  5. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. And Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science (35:8). Pp. 982-1003.
  6. Jackson, P.W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  7. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
  8. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books. Petit dit Dariel, O.J., Raby, T., Ravaut, F., & Rothan-Tondeur, M. (2013). Developing the Serious Games potential in nursing education. Nurse education today 33(12), 1569-1575.
  9. Reiser, R.A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. Educational technology research and development 49(1), pp. 53-64.
  10. Rowe, M.W. (1992). The definition of “game”. Philosophy 67(262), pp. 467-479.
  11. Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology. London: Continuum.
  12. Skinner, B.F. (1985) Cognitive science and behaviourism, British Journal of Psychology 76, pp. 291-301.
  13. Stanley, D. And Latimer, K. (2011). ‘The Ward’: A simulation game for nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice 11(1), pp. 20-25.
  14. Stones, E. (1970). Readings in educational psychology: Learning and teaching. London: Methuen. Acknowledgements

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References