You are here:

Argumentation Spaces for Learning: Toward a New Coherence in Teaching, Learning, and Assessments for Frictionless Interactions
PROCEEDINGS

, Learning Technologies Consultant, United States ; , AmbientEase, Canada

  • Full Text
  • Citation
  • Save to Collections
  • E-mail
  • Share
  • OpenURL

    • E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in New Orleans, LA, USA ISBN 978-1-939797-12-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

    Abstract

    The purpose of this paper is to describe the initial phase of a project to develop Project Organizers (POs) which support personalization of instruction; a sense of community around reading and writing; and high quality professional development for educators. Project Organizers are designed to guide learners through exploration and research of instructor-selected topics incorporating carefully curated content to address single or cross-curricular subjects. In nurturing individual interests and self-selected topics, POs advance the goal of developing evidence-supported argumentation essays and in-depth research papers.

    Citation

    Chauncey, S. & McKenna, H.P. (2014). Argumentation Spaces for Learning: Toward a New Coherence in Teaching, Learning, and Assessments for Frictionless Interactions. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 356-360). New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 24, 2019 from .

    © 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

    View References & Citations Map

    References

    1. Bex, F., Lawrence, J., Snait, M., & Reed, C. (2013). Implementing the argument web. Communications of the ACM, 56(10), pp. 86-73.
    2. Chauncey, S.A. (2014). Spiders Mini Research Project. DigitalPencil. Http://www.digitalpencil.org/Projects_AllGrades/Parcc_Research_Simulation_Practice_812_2/Research_Simulation_Spiders.aspx (accessed 29 September 2014).
    3. Chauncey, S.A. (2009). Project Organizers. Digital Pencil: Convergence Blips in a Parallel Universe. Http://www.digitalpencil.org/ProjectOrganizers.aspx (accessed 29 September 2014).
    4. Denning, P.J. (2014). Avalanches are coming. Communications of the ACM, 57(6), pp. 34-36.
    5. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H.J.A., Mulder, M., & Chizan, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSLCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), pp. 79-106.
    6. Project Excite. (2005). Welcome to Project Excite. Http://edhd.bgsu.edu/excite/ (accessed 27 May 2014).
    7. Schwarz, B.B. (2009). Argumentation and learning. In N. Muller& A.-N. Perret-Clermont (eds.), Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices. Springer. Vega, Venessa. (2012). Project-based learning research review. Edutopia. Http://www.edutopia.org/pblresearch-learning-outcomes (accessed 27 May 2014).

    These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

    Slides