Using Online Case Studies to Enhance Teacher Preparation
Laila Richman, Towson University, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 23, Number 4, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact interactive, online case studies have on learning for preservice teachers. More specifically, it evaluated whether the use of online case studies in instruction could enhance the level of knowledge the preservice teacher gained from the content material. This study utilized a nonequivalent group, pretest–posttest comparison design in an effort to analyze the impact of the online case studies in increasing teachers’ depth of knowledge. One-hundred and fifty students enrolled in teacher preparation programs at three universities in two states participated. The experimental group, who interacted with the case studies, showed significant differences in their posttest performance. Their mean score on Abstract questions on the posttest was significantly higher than that of the comparison group, who did not interact with the case studies. This finding in combination with student feedback suggests subjects gained a higher level of understanding and application knowledge through interacting with the online case studies. Much of the literature supporting the use of case study methods in teacher preparation focuses on satisfaction, lacking outcome-related data. The results of this study demonstrate a significant, measurable change in teacher learning based on the use of online case studies.
Richman, L. (2015). Using Online Case Studies to Enhance Teacher Preparation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(4), 535-559. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved June 8, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/148669/.
© 2015 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
- Bloom, B.S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: David mcKay company, inc.
- Brooke, S. (2006). Using the case method to teach online classes: promoting Socratic dialogue and critical thinking skills. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 146-158.
- Darling-hammond, L., LaFors J., & Snyder, J. (2001). Educating teachers for california’s future. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(1), 9-55.
- Diamantes, T. & Ovington, J. (2003). Storytelling: Using a case method approach in administrator preparation programs. Education, 123(3), 465-469.
- Flynn, L. (2008). In praise of performance-based assessments: a teacher’s outlook on testing is changed after students are assessed through hands-on tasks. Science and Children, 45(8), 32-5.
- Frey, B. (2003). Bloom’s Taxonomy. Retrieved march 22, 2005 from http://www.specialconnections.ku.edu/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/specconn/main.php?cat=assessment §ion=main&subsection=qualitytest/bloom
- Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. Kunselman, J.C. & Johnson, K.A. (2004). Using the case method to facilitate learning. College Teaching, 52(3), 87-92.
- Ozdilek, Z. (2014). Learner’s views about using case study teaching method in an undergraduate level analytical chemistry course. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(5), 695-708.
- Shulman, L.S. (1996). Just in case: Reflections on learning from experience. In colbert, J., Desberg, P, & Trimble, K. (Eds.), The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp.197-217). Boston: allyn
- United States Department of Education (2011). Our future, our teachers: The Obama Administration’s plan for teacher education reform and improvement. Washington, Dc: author.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References