You are here:

Balancing Instruction, Learner Needs, and Distance Education: A Faculty Dialogue
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , , Appalachian State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Atlanta, GA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-52-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

Because new technologies and techniques continually emerge in education methodology in teaching and facilitating learning are ever changing. Consequently, faculty members from Appalachian State University will facilitate a dialogue that focuses on issues directly related to the use of technology in distance education. They will include in the discussion topics such as negotiating policy mandates, current research on distance education, and meeting student learner needs. In this roundtable format, presenters will highlight issues involved with faculty decisions and present an outline for determining the use of technological tools to meet the multiple demands from students, administrators, colleagues, and other participants in the learning process. The dialogue will also include concerns for maintaining sound instructional practices while varying delivery modes.

Citation

Pacifici, L., Zimmerman, S., Horton, J., Riedl, D. & Knight, C. (2004). Balancing Instruction, Learner Needs, and Distance Education: A Faculty Dialogue. In R. Ferdig, C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2004--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2517-2521). Atlanta, GA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 17, 2019 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bremner, F. (1998). On-line college classes get high marks among students. USA Today, November 16.
  2. Connell, G. (1997). Distance holds the key to growth. Times Higher Education Supplement, 12.
  3. Dominguez, P.S. & Ridley, D. (1999). Reassessing the assessment of distance education courses. T.H.E. Journal, 27(2).
  4. Guernsey, L. (1998). Distance education for the not-so-distance. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44(29).
  5. Owusu-Ansah, A. (2003). Technology-based distance education: Perceptions of instructional faculty and the implications for facilitating use. Southern Regional Council on Educational Administration 2003 Yearbook.
  6. Ryan, R.C. (2000). Student assessment comparisons of lecture and online construction equipment and methods classes. T.H.E. Journal, January.
  7. Schuemer, R. (1993). Strategies for learning at a distance. In Willis, B. Distance education: A practical guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  8. Schulman, A.H. And Sims, R.L. (1999). Learning in an online format versus an in-class format: An experimental study. T.H.E. Journal, 26(11).
  9. Sherry, L. (1996). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Distance Learning, 1(4).
  10. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Relate-create-donate: An educational philosophy for the cyber-generation. Computers& Education, 31(1).
  11. Watkins, R. & Kaufman, R. (2003). Strategic planning for distance education. In M.G. Moore& W.G. Anderson (Eds.) Handbook of Distance Learning (pp. 507 – 517). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections