You are here:

A Comparative Analysis of Tests Using Smartphones and Tablet PCs: Perceptions about the Number of Test Questions and Motivation for Taking the Test PROCEEDINGS

, Tokyo Gakugei University, Japan ; , Nagoya University, Japan

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Tampere, Finland ISBN 978-1-939797-08-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

An experimental environment was developed for students enrolled in an Introduction to Information Science university course using a test that included 20 multiple-choice questions, with a comparative analysis being conducted for students taking the test with either a smartphone or tablet PC. We focused on the number of test questions and students’ motivation for taking the test, while also taking into consideration their test approach and avoidance tendencies. The results of the analysis revealed that subjects in the tablet PC group tended to perceive there to be more questions than those in the smartphone group; however, neither group considered the test to be a burden. Overall, students’ motivation to answer the questions was high and they found it useful for reviewing class learning material. In addition, based on the responses from both groups, it was estimated that around 15 questions would be a suitable number for the test.

Citation

Kitazawa, T. & Sato, K. (2014). A Comparative Analysis of Tests Using Smartphones and Tablet PCs: Perceptions about the Number of Test Questions and Motivation for Taking the Test. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 807-812). Tampere, Finland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 14, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Akkoyunlu. B. And Yılmaz-Soylu, M. (2008). Development of a Scale on Learners’ Views on Blended Learning and its Implementation Process. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 26-32.
  2. Bloom, B.S., Hastings, T.H., & Madaus, G.F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
  3. Central Education Council. (2008). Toward the Construction of Undergraduate Education. Retrieved November 13, 2013, from http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo4/houkoku/080410/001.pdf (in Japanese).
  4. Kitazawa, T. (2013). The Design of the Test Format for Tablet Computers in Blended Learning Environments: A Study of the Test Approach-Avoidance Tendency of University Students, Proceedings of the International Conference E-Learning 2013, Prague, Czech Republic (July 23-26, 2013), 466-469.
  5. Suzuki, M. (2011). How learning strategies are affected by the attitude toward tests: Using competence as a moderator. Japanese Journal for Research on Testing, 7(1), 52-65 (in Japanese).
  6. White, B. & Larusson, J. (2010). Seeing, Thinking, Doing: Strategic Directives for Learning Management Systems. In J. Sanchez& K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010, Chesapeake, VA: AACE. (Retrieved December 7, 2013), 1279-1288.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.