You are here:

Teacher Self-Efficacy in 1:1 iPad Integration in Middle School Science and Math Classrooms

, , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

CITE Journal Volume 15, Number 3, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA


Many schools are beginning to adopt one-to-one computing with the goal of developing students’ 21st-century skills, which allow students not only to learn content but to acquire critical skills (e.g., creativity, collaboration, and digital literacy) that will lead to future careers. Technology offers teachers the ability to transform the quality of instruction—to achieve a more student-centered learning environment, have more differentiated instruction, and develop problem- or project-based learning, and demand higher order thinking skills. A number of barriers and influences have emerged from the findings of this study on teachers’ practice and integration of technology into their classrooms. This study examines how these barriers, both internal and external, influence classroom pedagogy. Using a technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK) framework, this paper examines the classroom practice of two middle grades mathematics and science teachers integrating a 1:1 initiative and the ways they dealt with the barriers in their classroom practices.


Minshew, L. & Anderson, J. (2015). Teacher Self-Efficacy in 1:1 iPad Integration in Middle School Science and Math Classrooms. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 334-367. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 18, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Abbitt, J.T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technology pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134-143. Doi:10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670
  2. Achieve (2013). Next generation science standards: For states by states. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
  3. Barab, S.A., Thomas, M, Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development 53(1), 86-108. Doi: 10.2190/ec.41.2.a
  4. Barab, S.A., Zuiker, S., Warren, S., Hickey, D., Ingram-Goble, A., Kwon, E-J., Kouper, I., & Herring, S.C. (2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts. Science Education,91(5), 750-782.
  5. Becker, H.J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 291-321.
  6. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp.361-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions
  8. Fleischer, H. (2012). What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review. Educational Research Review, 7, 107-122.
  9. Greaves, T., Hayes, J., Wilson, L., Gielniak, M., & Peterson, R. (2012). Revolutionizing education through technology: The project RED roadmap for transformation. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  10. Guzey, S.S., & Roehrig, G.H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25-45.
  11. Hew, K.F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. Doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  12. Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343-367.
  13. Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences informing technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277-302.
  14. Hsu, S. (2010). The relationship between teacher’s technology integration ability and usage. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(3), 309-325.
  15. Keengwe, J., Schnellert, G., & Mills, C. (2012). Laptop initiative: Impact on instructional technology integration and student learning. Educational and Information Technologies, 17(2), 137-146. in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3)
  16. Kim, C., Kim, M.K., Lee, C., Spector, J.M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76-85.
  17. Kopcha, T. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers& Education, 59(4), 1109-1121. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2012.05.014
  18. Kumar, N., Rose, E.C., & D’Silva, J.L. (2008). Teachers’ readiness to use technology in the classroom: An empirical study. European Journal of Scientific Research, 21(4), 603616.
  19. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalist inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  20. Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning.Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, (pp.72-81). Boulder, CO: International
  21. Matzen, N.J., & Edmunds, J.A. (2007). Technology as a catalyst for change: The role of professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 417430.
  22. McCrory, R. (2008). Science, technology, and teaching: The topic-specific challenges of TPCK in science. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 193206).
  23. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523. in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3)
  24. Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (2006). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers and Education, 50(3), 1084-1091.
  25. Penuel, W.R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329-348.
  26. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
  27. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-14.
  28. Swan, K., Holmes, A., Vargas, J.D., Jennings, S., Meier, E., & Rebenfeld, L. (2002). Situated professional development and technology integration: The CATIE mentoring program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 169-190.
  29. Teo, T. (2014). Unpacking teachers’ acceptance of technology: Tests of measurement invariance and latent mean differences. Computers& Education, 75, 127-135.
  30. Vannatta, R.A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253-271.
  31. Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P.C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practice. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 173-207.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. International Teachers’ Evolving Relationships with Educational Technology

    Medha Dalal & Leanna Archambault, Arizona State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2018 (Mar 26, 2018) pp. 612–620

  2. Teacher Self-efficacy During the Implementation of a Problem-based Science Curriculum

    Charles Hodges, Georgia Southern University, United States; Jessica Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC), United States; Alicia Meng, Georgia Southern University, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 16, No. 4 (December 2016) pp. 434–451

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact