You are here:

Impact of Design Teams on Preservice Teachers’ TPACK, Attitudes, & Skills PROCEEDINGS

, Hezel Associates, LLC, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This study examined the effect of a design teams instructional approach on preservice teachers' attitudes toward technology, technology skills, and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). In a design teams approach, participants work in collaborative teams to design solutions to real-world problems. This quasi-experimental study explored the efficacy of an educational technology course implemented with a design teams approach compared to the same course utilizing a standard instructional approach. Findings indicated significant differences between the treatment and comparison groups on TPACK when measured with evidence from lesson plans. No significant differences were found between groups on survey-measured attitudes, technology skills, or TPACK, though both groups had significant growth on these measures. These results suggested that the design teams approach was appropriate for use in preservice teacher technology education, but additional research is necessary.

Citation

Johnson, L. (2014). Impact of Design Teams on Preservice Teachers’ TPACK, Attitudes, & Skills. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2544-2551). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 15, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Adamy, P., & Boulmetis, J. (2005). The impact of modeling on pre-service teachers' technology confidence. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 17(2), 100-120.
  2. Alayyar, G. (2011). Developing preservice teacher competenices for ICT integration through design teams. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  3. Alayyar, G., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2010). Technology integration in the science teachers' preparation program in Kuwait: Becoming TPACK competent through design teams. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education, San Diego, CA.
  4. Archambault, L.M., & Barnett, J.H. (2010). Revisiting Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers& Education, 55(4), 1656-1662.
  5. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2001). The Technology in Education Competency Survey (TECS): A self-appraisal Instrument for NCATE standards. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference, Orlando, Florida.
  6. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  7. Dawson, K., & Norris, A. (2000). Pre-service teachers' experiences in a K-12/university technology-based field initiative: Benefits, facilitators, constraints, and implications for teacher educators. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(1), 4-12.
  8. Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
  9. Evans, B.P., & Gunter, G.A. (2004). A catalyst for change: Influencing preservice teacher technology proficiency. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences, 41(3), 325-336.
  10. Fessakis, G., Tatsis, K., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2008). Supporting “learning by design” activities using group blogs. Educational Technology& Society, 11(4), 199-212.
  11. Graham, C.R., Tripp, T., & Wentworth, N. (2009). Assessing and improving technology integration skills for preservice teachers using the Teacher Work Sample. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(1), 39-62. Doi: 10.2190/EC.41.1.b
  12. Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. Public schools: 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
  13. Harris, J., Hofer, M.J., & Grandgenett, N. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education (SITE), Chesapeake, VA.
  14. Hawkes, M., & Romiszowski, A. (2001). Examining the reflective outcomes of asynchronous computer-mediated communication on inservice teacher development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 285-308.
  15. Hofer, M.J., Grandgenett, N., Harris, J., & Richardson, K. (2010). Preservice teachers’ technologically integrated planning: Contrasting quality and instructional variety by development approach. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Denver, Colorado.
  16. Hur, J.W., Cullen, T., & Brush, T. (2010). Teaching for application: A model for assisting pre-service teachers with technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 161-182.
  17. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
  18. Jonassen, D.H. (2006). Modeling with technology: Mindtools for conceptual change. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
  19. Kay, R.H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383-408.
  20. Kay, R.H. (2007). A formative analysis of how preservice teachers learn to use technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 366-383. Doi:10.1111/J.1365-2729.2007.00222.x
  21. Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55.
  22. Koehler, M., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers& Education, 49(3), 740-762. Doi: doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2005.11.012
  23. Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Yahya, K., & Yadav, A. (2004). Successful teaching with technology: The complex interplay of content, pedagogy, and technology. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2004, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  24. Kolodner, J.L. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 9-40.
  25. Lawless, K.A., & Pellegrino, J.W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575614.
  26. Leech, N.L., Barrett, K.C., & Morgan, G.A. (2008). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation. New York: Psychology Press.
  27. Lei, J., Lu, L., & Gilliard-Cook, T. (2010). IDE 300: Integrating Technology into Instruction II Syllabus. Syracuse University.
  28. Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers& Education, 51(4), 1523-1537.
  29. National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Educational technology in U.S. Public Schools: Fall 2008. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
  30. Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C.E., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: Transforming teacher education with Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers to Teach with Technology (PT3) grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 863-870.
  31. Pope, M., Hare, D., & Howard, E. (2002). Technology integration: Closing the gap between what preservice teachers are taught to do and what they can do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 191-203.
  32. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital imigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
  33. Project Tomorrow. (2011). The new 3 E's of education: Enabled, Engaged, Empowered: How today's educators are advancing a new vision of teaching and learning. Irvine, CA: Project Tomorrow.
  34. Risko, V.J., Vukelich, C., & Roskos, K. (2009). Detailing reflection instruction: The efficacy of a guided instructional procedure on prospective teachers' pedagogical reasoning. Action in Teacher Education, 31(2), 47-60.
  35. Ropp, M.M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402-424.
  36. Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Shin, T.S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
  37. Shin, T.S., Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., & Thompson, A.D. (2009). Changing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) through course experiences. Paper presented at the Society for Information and Teacher Education International Conference, Chesapeake, VA.
  38. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  39. Steeves, V. (2012). Young Canadians in a wired world: Teachers' perspectives. Retrieved from http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/01374/Young_Canadians_in_1374384a.pdf U.S. Department of Education. (2010). National Education Technology Plan 2010. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010
  40. Williams, M.K., Foulger, T.S., & Wetzel, K. (2009). Preparing preservice teachers for 21st century classrooms: Transforming attitudes and behaviors about innovative technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 393-418.
  41. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J.L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.