You are here:

Using Situated Learning and Multimedia to Investigate Higher-Order Thinking
Article

, , Edith Cowan University

Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Volume 8, Number 4, ISSN 1055-8896 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper describes a qualitative study into students' use of higher-order thinking as they use an interactive multimedia program based on a situated learning framework. The analysis of types of talk used by students as they worked with the program clearly shows that the majority of their thinking was higher order, as defined by Resnick (1987) and other theorists. Social, procedural and lower-order talk was less evident but present in their talk in reduced proportions. These findings suggest that a multimedia program based on a situated learning approach can provide a learning environment capable of supporting and maintaining substantial levels of higher-order thinking.

Citation

Herrington, J. & Oliver, R. (1999). Using Situated Learning and Multimedia to Investigate Higher-Order Thinking. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(4), 401-422. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 15, 2019 from .

© 1999 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Alexander, M., & Frampton, D. (1994). Technology and thinking: A qualitative study with interactive multimedia products. In C. McBeath & R. Atkinson
  2. Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of education goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domains. New York: Longman.
  3. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
  4. Duchastel, P.C. (1990). Examining cognitive processing in hypermedia usage. Hypermedia, 2(3), 221-233.
  5. Ennis, R.H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into practice, 32(3), 179-186.
  6. Ertmer, P.A., & Newby, T.J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-72.
  7. Frampton, D. (1994). Analysing cognitions in a hypermedia learning environment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 81-95.
  8. Gagné, R.M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt Saunders.
  9. Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). Spoken and written language. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
  10. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A.R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 117-136). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  11. Henri, F., & Parer, M. (1993). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In T. Nunan (Ed.), Distance education futures (pp. 449-458). Adelaide: University of South Australia.
  12. Herrington, A.J., Sparrow, R.L., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R.G. (1997). Investigating assessment strategies in mathematics classrooms [Book and CDROM]. Perth: MASTEC, Edith Cowan University.
  13. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1995). Critical characteristics of situated learning: Implications for the instructional design of multimedia. In J. Pearce & A. Ellis (Eds.), Learning with technology (pp. 235-262). Parkville, Vic: University of Melbourne.
  14. Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Sparrow, L., & Oliver, R. (1998). Learning to teach and assess mathematics using multimedia: A teacher development project. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 89-112.
  15. Jonassen, D. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.
  16. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 4-16.
  18. Maor, D., & Taylor, P.C. (1995). Teacher epistemology and scientific inquiry in computerized classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 839-854.
  19. Marland, P., Patching, W., & Putt, I. (1992). Thinking while studying: A process tracing study of distance learners. Distance Education, 13(2) , 193217.
  20. Nastasi, B.K., & Clements, D.H. (1992). Social-cognitive behaviour and higher order thinking in educational computer environments . Learning and Instruction, 2, 215-238.
  21. Newmann, F.M. (1990). Higher order thinking in teaching social studies: A rationale for the assessment of classroom thoughtfulness. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(1), 41-56.
  22. Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (1996). Interactions in audiographics teaching and learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(1), 3454.
  23. Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy.
  24. Vockell, E., & Van Deusen, R.M. (1989). The computer and higher order thinking skills. Watsonville, CA: Mitchell.
  25. Von Wright, J. (1992). Reflections on reflection. Learning and Instruction, 2, 59-68.
  26. Young, M.F. (1995). Assessment of situated learning using computer environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(1), 89-96.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections