You are here:

Designing a Graduate Educational Technology Course For a New Kind of Learning: Distributive Constructionism in Practice
PROCEEDINGS

, , Northern Arizona University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, ISBN 978-1-880094-33-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper examines how distributed constructionism was used in designing a graduate course in Contexts of Educational Technology, how that course design was implemented, and how both the instructor and the students in the pilot class reported the benefits and drawbacks of using this model of learning as a course framework. Finding from the study that are presented in the paper includes data gathered from excerpts of student and instructor evaluations of the course, transcripts from on-line communications between students during the course, and information about the course derived from student interviews. Conclusions and recommendations for using a model of distributive constructionism will also be presented.

Citation

Batchelder, A. & Tucker, G. (1999). Designing a Graduate Educational Technology Course For a New Kind of Learning: Distributive Constructionism in Practice. In J. Price, J. Willis, D. Willis, M. Jost & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 1999--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 610-612). Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 25, 2021 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Barr, R.B. & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change(November/December) pp. 13-25
  2. Papert, S. (1990). Constructionist Learning. In I. Harel (Ed.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Media Laboratory. Resnick, M. (1996). New paradigms for computing, new paradigms for thinking. In Y.B. Kafai& M. Resnick (Eds.) Constructionism in Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  3. Shaw, A.(1996). Social constructionism in the inner city: Designing environments for social development and urban renewal. In Y.B. Kafai& M. Resnick (Eds.) Contructionism in Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  4. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References