References

1. Blakely, C., Mayer, J., Roitman, D., & Gottschalk, R. (1983). The implementation of disseminated educational innovations: Is the modified RD & D model viable? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., &
2. Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369-398.
3. Bolter, J.D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
4. Bossert, S.T. (1977). Tasks, group management, and teacher control behavior: A study of classroom organization and teacher style. School Review, 11, 552-565.
5. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Doyle, W. (1979). Classroom tasks and students’ abilities. In P.L. Peterson & H.H. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 183-209). Berkeley, CA: McCutcheon.
7. Gomez, L., Fishman, B., & Pea, R. (1998). The CoVis Project: Building a large scale science education testbed. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(1-2), 59-92.
8. Gordin, D.N., Polman, J.L., & Pea, R.D. (1994). The Climate Visualizer: Sensemaking through scientific visualization. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(4), 203-225.
9. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1-32.
10. Hawkins, J. (1987). The interpretation of Logo in practice. In R. Pea & K. Sheingold (Eds.), Mirrors of minds: Patterns of experience in educational computing (pp. 3-34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Hoffman, D., & Novak, T.P. (1998). Bridging the digital divide: The impact of race on computer access and Internet use (Working Paper). Nashville, TN: Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University. Http://www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/papers/pdf/digital.divide.PDF.
12. Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P., & Venkatesh, A. (1997). Diversity on the Internet: The relationship of race to access and usage. Paper presented at the meeting of the Aspen Institute’s Forum on Diversity and the Media, Queenstown, MD.
13. Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. In P. Bauersfeld, J. Bennett, & G. Lynch (Eds.), ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 119-125). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
14. Landow, G.P. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Leinhardt, G., Weidman, C., & Hammond, K.M. (1987). Introduction and integration of classroom routines by expert teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(2), 135-176.
16. Levin, J., & Cohen, M. (1985). The world as an international science laboratory: Electronic networks for science instruction and problem solving. Journal of 26 Fishman
17. Levin, J., Waugh, M., Chung, H.K., & Miyake, N. (1992). Activity cycles in educational electronic networks. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 3-13.
18. Levin, J.A., Kim, H., & Riel, M.M. (1989). Analyzing instructional interactions on electronic message networks. In L.M. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 185-213). New York:
19. Papert, S. (1984, October). Trying to predict the future. Popular Computing.
20. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1-11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21. Pea, R. (1987). The aims of software criticism: Reply to Professor Papert. Educational Researcher, 16(5), 4-8.
22. Pea, R.D., & Gomez, L.M. (1992). The Collaborative Visualization Project: Shared-technology learning environments for science learning. Enabling Technologies for High-Bandwidth Applications (pp. 253-264). Boston,
23. Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
24. Ruopp, R.R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (1993). LabNet: Toward a community of practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68.
26. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R.S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E.(1989). Computer supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 51-68.
27. Schmitz, J., & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail: A test of the social influence model of technology use. Communication Research, 18(4), 487-523.
28. Schwab, R.G., Hart-Landsberg, S., Reder, S., & Abel, M. (1992). Collaboration and constraint: Middle school teaching teams. In J. Turner & R. Kraut (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Work (pp. 241-248). Toronto,

Cited By

• Just-in-time online professional development activities for an innovation in small rural schools

  Christine Hamel, Stéphane Allaire, Sandrine Turcotte & Sandrine Turcotte

  Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie Vol. 38, No. 3 (Nov 12, 2012)

• Just-in-time online professional development activities for an innovation in small rural schools

  Christine Hamel, Stéphane Allaire & Sandrine Turcotte

  Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie Vol. 38, No. 3 (Nov 12, 2012)

• College Students’ Perspectives and Attitudes toward e-Learning: Assessment for Development of Internet-based DL Courses

  Randy Hirokawa, Bill Chen & Robert Chi, University of Hawaii at Hilo, United States

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (October 2006) pp. 569–573

• 'Learning activity' as the basic structural element for the design of web-based content: A case study

  Maria Kordaki, Department of Computer Engineering and Informatics, Patras University, Greece, Greece

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (October 2006) pp. 88–96

• Comparison of Nursing Student Perceptions and Attitudes toward Hybrid & Online Courses

  Patti Urso, Bill Chen & Robert Chi, University of Hawaii at Hilo, United States

  Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (Mar 19, 2006) pp. 576–581

• Factors for Successful Online Collaborative Learning: Experiences from Malaysian Secondary School Students

  Ah-Choo Koo, Chien-Sing Lee & Weng-Ping Chin, Multimedia University, Malaysia

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 2031–2038

• An Analysis of Learners' Interactions with Course Package and Learning Support Services in Distance Learning

  Jianwei Zhang, Educational Technology Center, Tsinghua University, China; Yanqing Sun, School of psychology, Beijing Normal University, China; Xueyou Wang & Gengsheng Wu, Educational Technology Center, Tsinghua University, China

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2003 (2003) pp. 361–368

• Learning Web Communication Through the Experiments

  Eriko Niwa, Sanno University, Japan

  WebNet World Conference on the WWW and Internet 2000 (2000) pp. 926–927

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.