Current Practice in Designing Training for Complex Skills: Implications for Design and Evaluation of ADAPTIT
PROCEEDINGS
Deniz Eseryel, Univ. of Bergen, Norway/Syracuse Univ., United States ; Marian Schuver-van Blanken, Dutch National Aerospace Laboratory (NLR) ; J. Michael Spector, Univ. of Bergen, Norway/ Syracuse Univ., United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Norfolk, VA USA ISBN 978-1-880094-42-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Abstract
ADAPTIT is a European project within the Information Society Technologies programme that is providing design methods and tools to guide training designers according to the latest cognitive science and standardization principles. An extensive needs assessment phase has been completed. The aim of this effort was to explore current practice in instructional design and associated with that, the needs of the training designers in order to improve their practice and to insure that real world needs will be addressed in the project and its products. This paper reports the needs assessment procedures and outcomes informing how they guide the efforts within the project.
Citation
Eseryel, D., Blanken, M.S.v. & Spector, J.M. (2001). Current Practice in Designing Training for Complex Skills: Implications for Design and Evaluation of ADAPTIT. In C. Montgomerie & J. Viteli (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2001--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 474-479). Norfolk, VA USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8246/.
© 2001 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- ADAPTIT (2000). Advanced design approach for personalised training-interactive tools: Design preparation training designer's needs. ADAPTIT Deliverable 2.2 (NLR-TR-2000-528) prepared for the European Commission DGXIII under contract no. IST-1999-11740. Amsterdam: NLR.
- Eseryel, D., & Spector, J.M. (2000). Assessing adaptive instructional design tools and methods in ADAPTIT. In M.R. Simonson (Ed.), Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Paper Presentations at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications, Denver, CO.
- Gros, B., Elen, J., Kerres, M., Merriënboer, J., & Spector, M. (1997). Instructional design and the authoring of multimedia and hypermedia systems: Does a marriage make sense? Educational Technology, 37(1), 48-56.
- Holcomb, C., Wedman, J.F., & Tessmer, M. (1996). ID activities and project success: Perception of practitioners. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 9(1), 49-61.
- Klimczak, A.K., & Wedman, J.F. (1997). Instructional design project success factors: An empirical basis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 75-84.
- Loughner, P., & Moller, L. (1998). The use of task analysis procedures by instructional designers. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 11(3), 79-100.
- Maistre, C.L. (1998). What is an expert instructional designer? Evidence of expert performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 21-36.
- Perez, R.S., & Emery, C.D. (1995). Designer thinking: How novices and experts think about instructional design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(3), 80-95.
- Pieters, J.M., & Bergman, R. (1995). The empirical basis of designing instruction. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(3), 118-129.
- Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of experts practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 65-86.
- Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1991). Survey of instructional design competencies and needs. Proceedings of Selected Research Presentations at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications, Orlando: Florida.
- Spector, J.M., Polson, M.C., & Muraida, D.J. (Eds.) (1993). Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
- Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
- Visscher-Voerman, I. (1999). Educational design and development: A study of Dutch design practices. In J. Van den Akker, R.M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 45-58). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
- Wedman, J., & Tessmer, M. (1993). Instructional designers' decisions and priorities: A survey of design practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(2), 43-57.
- Zemke, R. (1985). The systems approach: A nice theory but.... Training, 38(2), 103-108. Acknowledgements The work presented in this paper is the outcome of the collaborative efforts of ADAPTIT project partners (see http://fjellbekk.eist.uib.no:2008/adaptit/) Co-ordinated by J. Vander Pal at the Dutch National Aerospace Laboratory
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References