You are here:

Best Practices for Missing Data Management in Counseling Psychology
ARTICLE

, ,

Journal of Counseling Psychology Volume 57, Number 1, ISSN 0022-0167

Abstract

This article urges counseling psychology researchers to recognize and report how missing data are handled, because consumers of research cannot accurately interpret findings without knowing the amount and pattern of missing data or the strategies that were used to handle those data. Patterns of missing data are reviewed, and some of the common strategies for dealing with them are described. The authors provide an illustration in which data were simulated and evaluate 3 methods of handling missing data: mean substitution, multiple imputation, and full information maximum likelihood. Results suggest that mean substitution is a poor method for handling missing data, whereas both multiple imputation and full information maximum likelihood are recommended alternatives to this approach. The authors suggest that researchers fully consider and report the amount and pattern of missing data and the strategy for handling those data in counseling psychology research and that editors advise researchers of this expectation. (Contains 1 table and 3 footnotes.)

Citation

Schlomer, G.L., Bauman, S. & Card, N.A. (2010). Best Practices for Missing Data Management in Counseling Psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 1-10. Retrieved December 4, 2021 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 19, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords