You are here:

Constructive “Noise in the Channel”: Effects of Controversial Forwarded E-mail in a College Residential and Virtual Community
PROCEEDINGS

, Stanford University, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Seattle, WA USA ISBN 978-1-880094-35-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

As part of a case study of electronic community building in a college freshman dorm, discussion list messages were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Messages were categorized by social purpose (housekeeping, social dialogue, or critical dialogue) and as either forwarded messages or original messages. Forwarded messages included jokes, polemics about politics or social issues, and electronic chain letters deemed offensive by some participants - e-mail forms that, along with metadiscussion, have been widely perceived as distractions and impediments to serious online discussion. A series of discussion threads about gender issues, however, reveals that such "noise in the channel" can frequently lead to constructive critical dialogue, both online and offline, in the context of a residential student community.

Citation

Holeton, R. (1999). Constructive “Noise in the Channel”: Effects of Controversial Forwarded E-mail in a College Residential and Virtual Community. In B. Collis & R. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 1999--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 652-657). Seattle, WA USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 5, 2021 from .

© 1999 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Chapman, G. (1995). Flamers: cranks, fetishists and monomaniacs. The New Republic 212(15), 13-16.
  2. Colomb, G.G. & Simutus, J.A. (1996). Visible conversation and academic inquiry: CMC in a culturally diverse classroom. In S. Herring, Computer-mediated communication: linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives 203-222.
  3. Grunwald, M. (1995). Vulgar e-mail sparks a furor. San Jose Mercury News D:1 (11 Nov).
  4. Harris, L.D. & Wambeam, C.A. (1996). The internet-based composition classroom: A study in pedagogy. Computers and Composition 13, 353-371.
  5. Korenman, J. & Wyatt, N. (1996). Group dynamics in an e-mail forum. In S. Herring, Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives 225-242. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  6. Ong, W. (1981). Fighting for life: contest, sexuality, and consciousness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  7. Rheingold, H. (1994). The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  8. Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil: Second thoughts on the information highway. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  9. Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5. New York, NY: Avon Books.
  10. Ziv, O. (1996). Writing to work: How using e-mail can reflect technological and organizational change. In S. Herring,Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives 243-263. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Acknowledgements

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References