You are here:

AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNET-BASED COMMUNICATION AND COLLABORATION AMONG K-12 TEACHERS PROCEEDINGS

, , , , , Arizona State University, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Seattle, WA USA ISBN 978-1-880094-35-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

This study investigated the use of asynchronous (mailing lists) and synchronous (chat sessions) Internet-based communication and its impact on teachers' attitude toward collaboration, activity completion rate and test performance. Although in this study it was found that attitudes toward collaboration did not affect test performance, the data suggested a relationship between attitudes toward collaboration and use of Internet-based communication. Also, it was found that use of Internet-based communication increased the likelihood of completing the course activities.

Citation

Jannasch-Pennell, A., DiGangi, S.A., Andrews, S., Yu, C.H. & Ohlund, B. (1999). AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNET-BASED COMMUNICATION AND COLLABORATION AMONG K-12 TEACHERS. In B. Collis & R. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 1999--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1009-1014). Seattle, WA USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 17, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18, 159-175.
  2. Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of Behavior Modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  3. Bearison, D.J. (1982). New directions in studies of social interactions and cognitive growth. In F.C. Serafica (Ed.), SocialCognitive Development in Context, (pp.173-254). New York: Guilford Press.
  4. Biehler, R.F., & Snowman, J. (1986). Psychology Applied to Teaching. Sixth edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
  5. Cook, T.D. & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  6. Hall, J.M., George, A.A., & Rutherford, W.L. (1977). Measuring the stages of concern about an innovation: A manual for use
  7. Pugach, M.C., & Johnson, L.J. (1995). Collaborative practitioners, Collaborative schools. Denver: Love Publishing Company.
  8. Reed, W.M. (1990). The effect of computer-and-writing instruction on prospective English teachers™ attitudes toward and perceived use of computers in writing instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(1), 3-27.
  9. Schrage, M. (1990). Shared minds: The new technologies of collaboration. Random House.
  10. Shaw, A. (1995). Social constructivism and the inner city. [On-line]. Available: http://el.www.media.mit.edu/people/acs/chapter1.html
  11. Yu, C.H. (1998). An input-process-output structural framework for evaluating web-based instruction. [On-line]. Available: http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/~alex/teaching/assessment/structural.html
  12. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge: Harvard-University-Press.
  13. Wells, J.G., & Anderson, D.K. (1997). Learners in a telecommunications course: Adoption, diffusion and stages of concern. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(1), 83-106.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.