You are here:

Which Way To Jump: Conventional Frog Dissection, CD-Tutorial, or Microworld?
PROCEEDINGS

,

Selected Research and Development Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology [AECT],

Abstract

This study investigated and compared the level of initial and long-term retention of frog internal anatomy among students using an interactive CD tutorial, a desktop microworld, and conventional frog dissection. Students' anxiety toward science was also compared across the three treatment groups and between genders. Additional data on students' preferred learning style were used to explore possible interaction effects with their respective instructional activity. Subjects (n=280) were seventh-grade students in one junior high school. Classes were randomly assigned to the three modes of instruction. Data collection and testing occurred prior to treatment, one day after treatment, and three months after treatment. Data analysis showed mixed results for all measures taken. Differences in achievement favoring the conventional treatment from pretest to both posttests leveled out somewhat over time. Although anxiety levels declined for both genders after treatment, females reported significantly higher science anxiety than males both before and after treatment. There appeared to be a relationship between treatment and gender in terms of effect on science anxiety. No significant difference in achievement by learning style was observed. However, the interaction between learning style and treatment was significant in some cases. In looking at achievement defined as gain scores among the three achievement measures, some cases within the microworld treatment proved to be significant. (Contains 40 references.) (MES)

Citation

Marszalek, C.S. & Lockard, J. (1999). Which Way To Jump: Conventional Frog Dissection, CD-Tutorial, or Microworld?. Presented at Selected Research and Development Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology [AECT] 1999. Retrieved December 9, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 18, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords