You are here:

Introducing molecular life science students to model building using computer simulations
Article

, Wageningen UR, Netherlands ; , University of Leiden, Netherlands ; , , , , Wageningen UR, Netherlands

JCMST Volume 25, Number 2, ISSN 0731-9258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Computer simulations can facilitate the building of models of natural phenomena in research, for example in the molecular life sciences. In order to introduce molecular life science students to using computer simulations for model building, a digital case was developed in which students build a model for a pattern formation process in developmental biology with the help of experimental data and computer simulations. For the development of a pedagogical approach a number of design principles were used with respect to a suitable model building method and with respect to increasing the students' understanding of (biological) systems. The case was then developed along the lines of this approach. Additional software components have been developed to provide sufficient feedback and support for students when working with the simulations. The case has been evaluated in three courses, both at Wageningen University in the Netherlands and at the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Students appreciated working with the case and most exam questions about the contents of the case were answered relatively well.

Citation

Aegerter-Wilmsen, T., Janssen, F., Kettenis, D., Sessink, O., Hartog, R. & Bisseling, T. (2006). Introducing molecular life science students to model building using computer simulations. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(2), 101-122. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Aegerter-Wilmsen, T., Aegerter, C. M., & Bisseling, T. (2005). Model for the robust establishment of precise proportions in the early Drosophila embryo. J Theor Biol., 234(1), 13-19.
  2. Aegerter-Wilmsen, T., & Bisseling, T. (2005). Biology by numbers - Introducing quantitation into life science education. PLoS Biology, 3(1), E1. Aegerter-Wilmsen, T., Janssen, F. J. J. M., Hartog, R., & Bisseling, T. (2005). Digital learning material for model building in molecular biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 123-134.
  3. Ashe, H. L., & Levine, M. (1999). Local inhibition and long-range enhancement of Dpp signal transduction by Sog. Nature, 398(6726), 427-431.
  4. Bialek, W., & Botstein, D. (2004). Introductory science and mathematics education for 21st-Century biologists. Science, 303(5659), 788-790.
  5. Biehs, B., Francois, V., & Bier, E. (1996). The Drosophila short gastrulation gene prevents Dpp from autoactivating and suppressing neurogenesis in the neuroectoderm. Genes and Development, 10(22), 2922-2934.
  6. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. R. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  7. De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientifi c discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of educational research, 68(2), 179-201.
  8. Eldar, A., Dorfman, R., Weiss, D., Ashe, H., Shilo, B. Z., & Barkai, N. (2002). Robustness of the BMP morphogen gradient in Drosophila embryonic patterning. Nature, 419(6904), 304-308.
  9. Frederiksen, J. R., White, B. Y., & Gutwill, J. (1999). Dynamic mental models in learning science: The importance of constructing derivational linkages among models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 806-836. Knight, J. (2002). Physics meets biology: Bridging the culture gap. Nature, 419, 244-246.
  10. Koch, A. J., & Meinhardt, H. (1994). Biological pattern-formation - from basic mechanisms to complex structures. Reviews of Modern Physics, 66(4), 1481-1507.
  11. Lander, A. D. (2004). A calculus of purpose. PLoS Biology, 2(6), 712-714. Pennisi, E. (2003). Tracing life’s circuitry. Science, 302, 1646-1649. Resnik, D. (1995). Functional language and biological discovery. Journal of General Philosophy of Science, 2, 119-134.
  12. St Johnston, D., & Nusslein-Volhard, C. (1992). The origin of pattern and polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Cell, 68(2), 201-219.
  13. Turing, A. M. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 237(641), 37-72.
  14. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1989). Causal models as intelligent learning environments for science and engineering education. Applied Artifi cial Intelligence, 3(2-3), 167-190.
  15. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1990). Causal model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments. Artifi cial Intelligence, 42(1), 99-157.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Output-Classes for Faculty-Based Design-Oriented Research on Digital Learning Resources in Higher Education

    Rob Hartog, Wageningen MultiMedia Research Centre, Netherlands; Huub Scholten & Adrie Beulens, Wageningen University, Netherlands

    Proceedings of the Informing Science and Information Technology Education Conference 2013 (Jul 01, 2013) pp. 69–98

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.