You are here:

Fostering Mathematical Discourse in Online Asynchronous Discussions: An Analysis of Instructor Interventions
Article

, , Montana State University, United States

JCMST Volume 25, Number 1, ISSN 0731-9258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe a typology of instructor discourse interventions to enhance mathematical discourse in online asynchronous discussions in a statistics for teachers' course. A completely asynchronous model of distance delivery was used for the statistics for teachers' course. Emphasis was given to fostering mathematical discourse in that the students in the course were encouraged state their ideas, elaborate on their thinking and compare their ideas with previously shared ideas. Using the constant comparative methodology for developing theory, the analysis of asynchronous discussions revealed five recurring categories of response with respect to instructor intervention: (a) resolve, (b) validate, (c) redirect, (d) expand, and (e) withhold. With respect to the identified typology, the authors recommend that the default action on the part of the instructor be to withhold, using one of the other interventions only if necessary. Withholding encourages the students to lead and become active participants in the discussion, thus enhancing mathematical discourse. Implications of the findings and recommendations for future research are also given in the paper.

Citation

Simonsen, L. & Banfield, J. (2006). Fostering Mathematical Discourse in Online Asynchronous Discussions: An Analysis of Instructor Interventions. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(1), 41-75. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 2, 2021 from .

© 2006 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  2. Elliot, P. C., & Kenny, M. J. (1996). 1996 Yearbook: Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond. Reston VA: NCTM
  3. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17(4), 397-431.
  4. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115-152.
  5. Jarvela, S., & Hakkinen, P. (2002). Web-based cases in teaching and learning – the quality of discussions and a stage of perspective taking in asynchronous communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 10(1), 1-22.
  6. Merriam, S. B. (1997). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
  7. Moore, D. S., & McCabe, G. P. (2000). Introduction to the practice of statistics, Third Edition. New York: Freeman Publications.
  8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  9. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: NCTM
  10. National Science Foundation (NSF) (2002). The application and implications of information technologies in postsecondary education: An initial bibliography, NSF 02-305, Arlington, VA: NSF.
  11. Sherin, M. G. (2003). A balancing act: Developing a discourse community in a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 205233.
  12. Spiceland, J., & Hawkins, C. (2002). The impact on learning of an asynchronous active learning course format. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6, 68-75.
  13. Steele, D. F. (1998) Look who’s talking: Discourse in a fourth-grade class. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4, 286-292.
  14. Weiss, I. R. (1994). A profi le of science and mathematics education in the United States: 1993. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.