References

1. Anderson, T & Elloumi, F (Eds.) (2004). Theory and practice of online learning. Canada: Athabasca University Press.
2. Arh, T., Jerman, A., Marija, B and Peternel, M (2012). ‘Practice Firms, E-learning and Web 2.0 Technologies as a Bases of SELPRAF Training Programme for Unemployed’. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies 1 (6): 165 – 73
3. Bates, A (2005). Technology, E-Learning and Distance Education. Routledge: London.
4. Bates, A and Poole, G (2003). Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco.
5. Biggs, J. (2003) Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.
6. Blustain, H., Goldstein, P& Lozier, G (1999) ‘Assessing the New Competitive Landscape’. In: R. Katz (Ed.) Dancing with the Devil: information technology and the new competition in higher education [pp 52 – 80]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
7. Boyd, M.A., Gerrow, J.D and Duquette, P (2004). Student state of readiness for e-learning: university of Sheffield’s faculty of medicine. European Journal of Dent Education 8: 95 – 96
8. Brandenburg, D.C and Ellinger, A.D (2003). ‘The Future: Just-in-Time Learning Expectations and Potential Implications for Human Resource Development’. Advances in Developing Human Resources 5 (3): 308 – 20
9. Brown, E., Cristea, A., Stewart, C., Brailsford, T (2005). ‘Patterns in authoring of adaptive educational hypermedia: taxonomy of learning styles’. Educational E-Learning in Higher Education– Opportunities& Challenges for Dubai 465
10. Brown, S., Edmonds, S and Lee, B (2001). Continuing professional development: LEA and school support for teachers. Slough: NFER.
11. Carr, N & Chambers, D.P (2006). ‘Cultural and organisational issues facing online learning communities of teachers’. Educational Information Technology 11: 269 – 82
12. Chapman, L., Masters, J and Pedulla, J (2010). ‘Do digital divisions still persist in schools? Access to technology and technical skills of teachers in high needs schools in the United States of America’. Journal of education for teaching 36 (2): 239 – 49
13. Chorng-Shyong, O and Jung-Yu, L (2006). ‘Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance’. Computers in Human Behavior 22: 816 – 29
14. Colin McCormack, C and Jones, D (1997). ‘Building a Web-Based education System’. Paperback with CD-ROM: London: John Wiley& Sons.
15. Collis, B. (1998) New didactics for university instruction: why and how? Computers and Education 31: 373 – 93.
16. Cortez, C., Nussbaum, M., Woywood, G & Aravena, R (2009). ‘Learning to collaborate by collaborating: a face-to-face collaborative activity for measuring and learning basics about teamwork’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 25: 126 – 42.
17. Creanor, L., Gowan, D., Howalls, C & Trinder, K (2006). The learner’s voice: A focus on the learner experience [online]. Networked Learning Conference. Lancaster, UK.Available from http://networkedlearningconference.org.uk/abstracts/pdfs/ P24%20Creanor.pdf ]. [25 March 2013].
18. Daniels, H. (2001) Vygotsky and Pedagogy. London: Routledge Falmer.
19. Delone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (1992). ‘Information systems success. The quest for the dependent variable’. Information Systems Research 3: 60-95
20. Dukmak, S (2010). ‘Classroom interaction in regular and special education middle primary classrooms in the United Arab Emirates’. British Journal of Special Education 37 (1): 39 – 48
21. Ehlers, U (2004). ‘Quality in e-learning from a learner’s perspective’. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning. Retrieved February 14, 2013, from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2004/Online_Master_COPs.html.
22. Elango, R., Gudep, V.K and Selvam, M (2008). ‘Quality of e-Learning: An Analysis Based on e-Learners’ Perception of e-Learning’. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning 6 (1): 31-44
23. Engeström, Y (1987) Learning by Expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konultit Oy.
24. European Commission (2010). ‘Communication from the Commission to the European parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the committee of the regions: An Agenda for new skills and jobs-A European contribution towards full employment’. [Available: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0682:FIN:EN:PDF][Accessed 31 March 2013]
25. European Commission (2010). ‘The Key Competences for Lifelong Learning’ – A European Framework, Official Journal of the European Union. December 2006. Retrieved: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_394/ L_39420061230en00100018.pdf.
26. Fang, L (2007). ‘Perceiving the Useful, Enjoyable and Effective: A case study of the e ‐ learning experience of tertiary students in Singapore’. Educational Media Interna-466 Gokah, Gupta, and Ndiweni
27. Feldman, A. (2003) `Validity and quality in self-study’, Educational Researcher 32 (3): 26-28
28. Ghadah E.A and Magalhaes, R (2008). ‘Barriers to implementing e-learning: a Kuwaiti case study’. International Journal of Training and Development 12 (1): 36 – 53
29. Goodfellow, R. (2001). ‘Credit where it is due: assessing students’ contributions to collaborative online learning’. In: D. Murphy, R. Walker& G. Webb (Eds) Online learning and teaching with technology (pp. 73–80). London, Kogan Page
30. Graziadei, W., Gallagher, S., Brown, R and Sasiadek, J (2005). Building Asynchronous and Synchronous Teaching-Learning Environments: Exploring A Course/Classroom Management System Solution. [Available http://horizon.unc.edu/projects/monograph/CD/Technological_tools/Graziadei.asp] [Accessed: 23/3/2013]
31. Hargreaves, A (2000). ‘Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and teaching: history and practice’ 6 (2): 151–182.
32. Harrison, N (1999) How to Design Self-Directed and Distance Learning: A Guide for Creators of Web-Based Training, Computer-Based Training Self-Study Materials. New York: McGraw Hill
33. Heath, F.M., Boykin, J.F & Webster, D (2002). ‘Service Quality in the Information Environment: The LibQUAL+ Protocol’. Paper presented at the 4th International JISC/ CNI Conference: Service Quality Assessment in a Digital Library Environment. Edinburgh, UK
34. Hill, J. (1999) A conceptual framework for understanding information seeking in Open Ended Information Systems, Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 5–27.
35. Howland, J.J & Moore, J.L (2002). ‘Student perceptions as distance learners in Internet-based courses’. Distance Education 23: 183 – 97
36. Hrastinski, S (2009). ‘A theory of online learning as online participation’. Computers& Education 52: 78–82
37. Istance, D & Kools, M (2013). ‘OECD Work on Technology and Education: innovative learning environments as an integrating framework’. European Journal of Education 48 (1): 43 – 57
38. Johnson, D.W and Johnson, F.P (1975). Joining together: group theory and group skills. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon
39. Joseph, S (2005). Making Distance Education Work: Understanding Learning& Learners at a Distance. Barnes and Noble: England
40. Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G and Wachira, P (2008). ‘Computer Technology Integration and Student Learning: Barriers and Promise’. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17: 560 – 65
41. Kerr, M.S., Rynearson, K and Kerr, M.C (2006). ‘Student characteristics for online learning success’. Internet and Higher Education 9: 91–105
42. Kidd, T (2010). Online Education and Adult Learning: New Frontiers for Teaching Practices. New York: Hershey
43. Kidd, W (2013). ‘Framing pre-service teachers’ professional learning using Web2.0 tools: positioning pre-service teachers as agents of cultural and technological change’. Professional Development in Education 39 (2): 260 – 72
44. Knight, J. (2002). Trade in Higher Education Services: The Implications of GATS. October 2002 report of the Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. London: Commonwealth of Learning
45. Kvavik, R.B., Caruso, J.B. & Morgan, G. (2004) ‘ECAR Study of Students and Information Technology, 2004: Convenience, Connection, and Control’. Boulder, Colorado: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Http://www.educause.edu/ers0405/ [Ac DASHDASH
46. Littlejohn, A (2004). Reusing Online Resources: A Substantial Approach to E-Learning. Open& Flexible Learning Series. Routledge Falmer: United Kingdom
47. Ljubojevic, D and Laurillard, D (2011). ‘Evaluating learning designs through the formal representation of pedagogical patterns’. In: C. Kohls and J. Wedekind [Eds.]. Investigations of e-learning patterns: context factors, problems and solutions. [pp. 86–
48. Macdonald, J (2001). ‘Exploiting online interactivity to enhance assignment development and feedback on an ODL course’. Open Learning 16 (2): 179 – 89.
49. Maier, P& Warren, A. (2000) Integrating Technology in Learning and Teaching. London: Kogan Page.
50. McConnell, D (1994) Implementing Computer Supported Learning. London: Kogan Page.
51. McDowell, L. (2002). ‘Electronic information resources in undergraduate education: an exploratory study of opportunities for student learning and independence’. British Journal of Educational Technology 33 (3): 255 – 66.
52. Motteram, G and Forrester, G (2005). ‘Becoming an Online Distance Learner: What can be learned from students’ experiences of induction to distance programmes?’ Distance Education 26 (3): 281 — 298
53. O’Leary, R. And Cai, C (2003) ‘SOLE Case Study Series, Economics’, [Available: http://sole.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ] [Accessed: 30th March 2013]
54. Phipps, R & Merisotis, J (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy. [Available: http://www.ihep.com/ Pubs/PDF/Difference. PDF] [Accessed March 16, 2013]
55. Palmer, S.R and Holt, D.M (2009). ‘Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 25: 101– 113
56. Rodríguez, P., Nussbaum, M & Dombrovskaia, L (2012). ‘ICT for education: a conceptual framework for the sustainable adoption of technology-enhanced learning environments in schools’. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 21 (3): 291 – 315
57. Ronteltap, F & Eurelings, A (2002). ‘Activity and interaction of students in an electronic learning environment for problem based learning’. Distance Education, 23 (1): 11 – 22.
58. Salmon, G (2000). E-Moderating-The Key To Teaching& Learning On-Line. London: Kogan Page.
59. Sanders, R (2006). ‘The “Imponderable Bloom”: Reconsidering the Role of Technology in Education’, Innovate 2 (August/September): http://www.innovateonline.info/index. Php?view=article&id=232 [Accessed 29 March 2013].
60. Saunders, G. & Klemming, F (2003) ‘Integrating Technology into a Traditional Learning Environment’. Active Learning in Higher Education 4: 74–86.
61. Schrum, L. (1998). ‘Online education: A study of emerging pedagogy’. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 78 (1): 53 – 61
62. Scott, S (2010). ‘Pragmatic leadership development in Canada: investigating a mentoring approach’. Professional Development in Education 36 (4): 563 – 79.
63. Seawright, J and Gerring, J (2008). ‘Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options’. Political Research Quar-468 Gokah, Gupta, and Ndiweni
64. Seddon, P.B. (1997). ‘A respecification and extension of Delone and Mclean model of IS success’. Information Systems Research 8 (3): 240-53
65. Selinger, M (2004). ‘Cultural and pedagogical implications of a global e-learning programme’. Cambridge Journal of Education 34 (2): 223 – 39
66. Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G and Francis, R (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice. London: Higher Education Academy
67. Sheard, J & Markham, S. (2005). ‘Web-based learning environments: Developing a framework for evaluation’. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (4) : 353-68.
68. Somekh, B (2007). Pedagogy and learning with ICT: researching the art of innovation. London: Routledge.
69. Stacey, E., Smith, P.J and Barty, K (2004) Adult learners in the workplace: Online learning and communities of practice. Distance Education, 25(1): 107–121.
70. Stickel, S.A & Trimmer, K.J (1994). ‘Knowing in action: A first-year counsellor’s process of reflection’. Elementary School Guidance& Counselling 29: 102 − 09
71. Tait, A. (1995). Student support in open and distance learning. In F. Lockwood (Ed.), Open and distance learning today (pp. 232–241). London: Routledge.
72. Tam, M (2000) ‘Constructivism, Instructional Design, and Technology: implications for transforming distance learning’. Educational Technology and Society, 3(2): 50-60
73. Tavangarian, D., Leypold, M., Nolting, K and Roser, M (2001). ‘Is E-Learning the Solution For Individual Learning’? Electronic Journal of E-Learning 2 (2): 273 – 80.
74. Thompson, L & Ku, H.-Y (2005) ‘Chinese graduate students’ experiences and attitudes towards online learning’. Educational Media International 42 (1): 33-47.
75. Turney, CSM., Robinson, D., Lee, M and Soutar, A (2009). ‘Using technology to direct learning in higher education: The way forward?’ Active Learning in Higher Education 10(1): 71–83
76. Vygotsky, L (1978) Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. Watkins, R (2005). 75 E-Learning Activities: Making Online Learning Interactive. London: Pfeiffer Wiley.
78. Watson, D.M (2001). ‘Pedagogy before technology: re-thinking the relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and information technologies’ 6 (4): 251– 66.
79. Webb, E., Jones, A., Barker, P and Van-Schaik, P (2004) Using E-learning dialogues in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41(1): 93– 103.
80. Wenger, E (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. West, W., Rosser, B.R., Monani, S & Gurak, L (2006). ‘How Learning Styles Impact E-learning: a case comparative study of undergraduate students who excelled, passed, or failed an online course in scientific/technical writing’. E–Learning 3 (4): 534 – 42
82. Zhang, D and Nunamaker, J.F (2003). ‘Powering E-Learning in the New Millennium: An Overview of E-Learning and Enabling Technology’. Information Systems Frontiers 5 E-Learning in Higher Education– Opportunities& Challenges for Dubai 469