Incentives and Disincentives for the Use of OpenCourseWare
Anne Arendt, Brett Shelton, Utah State University
IRRODL Volume 10, Number 5, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press
This article examines Utah residents’ views of incentives and disincentives for the use of OpenCourseWare (OCW), and how they fit into the theoretical framework of perceived innovation attributes established by Rogers (1983). Rogers identified five categories of perceived innovation attributes: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. A survey instrument was developed using attributes that emerged from a Delphi technique with input from experts in the OCW field. The survey instrument was sent to 753 random individuals between 18 and 64 years of age throughout Utah. Results indicated that the greatest incentives for OCW use were the following: (a) no cost for materials, (b) resources available at any time, (c) pursuing in depth a topic that interests me, (d) learning for personal knowledge or enjoyment, and (e) materials in an OCW are fairly easy to access and find. The greatest disincentives for OCW use were the following: a) no certificate or degree awarded, (b) does not cover my topic of interest in the depth I desire, (c) a lack of professional support provided by subject tutors or experts, (d) a lack of guidance provided by support specialists, and (e) the feeling that the material is overwhelming. The authors recommend that institutions work to transition some OCW users into degree-granting paid programs as well as adopt a marketing campaign to increase awareness of OCW. Additionally, OCW websites should make their content available to recommendation engines such as ccLearn DiscoverEd, OCW Finder, or OER Recommender and should reciprocally link to one or more of these sites.
Arendt, A. & Shelton, B. (2009). Incentives and Disincentives for the Use of OpenCourseWare. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5),. Athabasca University Press.
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
In Search for the Open Educator: Proposal of a Definition and a Framework to Increase Openness Adoption Among University Educators
Fabio Nascimbeni & Daniel Burgos, Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (UNIR)
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 6 (Dec 06, 2016)
Emmanuelle Quillerou, UMR M_101 AMURE, Ifremer Brest Département d'Economie Maritime, Technopole de Brest-Iroise, BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org, France
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 12, No. 6 (Sep 22, 2011) pp. 178–197
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.