You are here:

Research and Practice in K-12 Online Learning: A Review of Open Access Literature
ARTICLE

, University of Florida ; , Wayne State University ; , TA Consulting, Springfield, Illinois, USA

IRRODL Volume 10, Number 1, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

The literature related to online learning programs for K-12 students dates to the mid-1990s and builds upon a century of research and practice from K-12 distance education. While K-12 online learning programs have evolved and grown over the past decade, the amount of published research on virtual schooling practice and policy is limited. The current literature includes practitioner reports and experimental and quasi-experimental studies, both published and unpublished. This paper reviews open access literature in K-12 online learning and reports on a structured content analysis of the documents. Themes in the literature include steady growth and a focus on the benefits, challenges, and broad effectiveness of K-12 online learning. In addition, newly developed standards for K-12 online learning are emerging in descriptions of effective practices.

Citation

Cavanaugh, C., Barbour, M. & Clark, T. (2009). Research and Practice in K-12 Online Learning: A Review of Open Access Literature. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(1),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved February 22, 2020 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Alavi, M., & Dufner, D. (2004). Technology-mediated collaborative learning: A research perspective. In S.R. Hiltz& R.G. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online (pp. 191213).
  2. Baker, J.D., Bouras, C., Hartwig, S.M., & McNair, E.R. (2005). K-12, Inc. And the Colorado Virtual Academy: A virtual charter school. In Z.L. Berge& T. Clark (Eds.), Virtual schools: Planning for success (pp. 133-142). New York: Teachers College Press.
  3. Ballas, F.A., & Belyk, D. (2000). Student achievement and performance levels in online education research study. Red Deer, AB: Schollie Research& Consulting. Retrieved July 31, 2005 from http://www.ataoc.ca/files/pdf/AOCresearch_full_report.pdf
  4. Barbour, M.K. & Mulcahy, D. (2006). An inquiry into retention and achievement differences in campus based and web based AP courses. Rural Educator, 27(3), 8-12.
  5. Barbour, M.K., & Reeves, T.C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers and Education, 52(2), 402-416.
  6. Barker, K., Wendel, T., & Richmond, M. (1999). Linking the literature: School effectiveness and virtual schools. Vancouver, BC: FuturEd. Retrieved July 31, 2005, from http://www.canlearn.ca/planning/pro/support/pdf/ComparingVirtualConventional.pdf
  7. Barker, K., & Wendel, T. (2001). E-Learning: Studying Canada's virtual secondary schools. Kelowna, BC: Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education. Retrieved July 31, 2005, from http://www.saee.ca/pdfs/006.pdf
  8. Berg, G.A. (1999). Community in distance learning through virtual teams. Educational Technology Review, 1(2), 23-29.
  9. Berge, Z.L., & Clark, T. (2005). Virtual schools: Planning for success. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  10. Bigbie, C., & McCarroll, W. (2000). The Florida high school evaluation 1999-2000 report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University. Retrieved February 25, 2007, from
  11. Butz, C. (2004). Parent and student satisfaction with online education at the elementary and secondary levels. Unpublished dissertation, University of Nevada atLas Vegas, Las Vegas, NV.
  12. Carabajal, K., LaPointe, D., & Gunawardena, C.N. (2003). Group development in online learning communities. In M.G. Moore& W.G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 217-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  13. Cavalluzzo, L. (2004). Organizational models for online education. Alexandria, VA: CNA Corporation. Retrieved August 9, 2006, from: www.cna.org/documents/P & P109.pdf
  14. Cavanaugh, T. & Cavanaugh, C. (2007). Virtual Schools and the School Library. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 251-256). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  15. Cavanaugh, C. & Clark, T. (2007). The landscape of K-12 online learning. In Cavanaugh, C. & Blomeyer, B. (Eds.), What works in K-12 online learning. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  16. Cavanaugh, C.S., Ferdig, R., Johnson, S.D., Lowes, S., Smith, R., & Blomeyer, R.L. (2006, November). What works in K-12 online learning. Paper presented at the annual Virtual School Symposium, Plano, TX.
  17. Cavanaugh, C. (2001). The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(1), 73-88.
  18. Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K.J., Bosnick, J., Hess, M., & Scott, H. (2005). Succeeding at the gateway: Secondary algebra learning in the virtual school. Jacksonville, FL: University of North Florida.
  19. Clark, T., Lewis, E., Oyer, E., & Schreiber, J. (2002). Illinois virtual high school evaluation, 2001-2002. Carbondale, IL: TA Consulting and Southern Illinois University. Retrieved July 4, 2005, from http://www2.imsa.edu/programs/ivhs/pdfs/IVHS_FinalRpt.pdf
  20. Clark, T. (2007). Virtual and distance education in North American schools. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 473-490). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
  21. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1).
  22. DiPietro, M., Ferdig, R.E., Black, E.W. & Preston, M. (2008). Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan Virtual School teachers. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1).
  23. Edelson, P.J., & Pittman, V.V. (2001). E-Learning in the United States: New directions and opportunities for university continuing education. Global E-Journal of Open, Flexible& Distance Education, 1(1), 71–83.
  24. Elbaum, B., McIntyre, C., & Smith, A. (2002). Essential elements: Prepare, design, and teach your online course. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
  25. Freedman, G., Darrow, R., Watson, J., & Lorenzo, G. (2002). California virtual school report: A national survey of virtual education practice and policy with recommendations for the State of California: Lorenzo Associates, Inc. Retrieved July 4, 2005, from http://www.edpath.com/images/VHSReport.pdf
  26. Hassell, B.C., & Terrell, M.G. (2004). How can virtual schools be a vibrant part of meeting the choice provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act? Virtual School Report. Retrieved November 11,
  27. Hernandez, F.J. (2005). Equity and access: The promise of virtual schools. In Z.L. Berge& T. Clark (Eds.), Virtual schools: Planning for success (pp. 20-34). New York, NY: Teachers
  28. Hill, J.R., Raven, A., & Han, S. (2007). Connections in web-based learning environments: A research-based model for community building. In R. Luppicini (Ed.), Learning communities in education (pp. 153-168). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  29. Johnston, S. (2004). Teaching anytime, anyplace, any pace. In C. Cavanaugh (Ed.), Development and management of virtual schools: Issues and trends (pp. 116-134).
  30. Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Marra, R.M. & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology (3rd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
  31. Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education. London: Routledge.
  32. Keeler, C. (2003). Developing and using an instrument to describe instructional design elements of high school online courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
  33. Kellogg, L., & Politoski, K. (2002). Virtual schools across America: Trends in K-12 online education. Los Angeles, CA: Peak Group Research Corporation.
  34. Knowles, M.S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy vs. Pedagogy. New York, NY: Association Press.
  35. Kollock, P. (1998). Design principles for online communities. PC Update, 15(5), 58-60.
  36. Kozma, R., Zucker, A., & Espinoza, C. (1998). An evaluation of the Virtual High School after one year in operation. Arlington, VA: SRI International. Retrieved July 31, 2005, from http://ctl.sri.com/publications/downloads/evalvhs1yr.pdf
  37. Lance, K. & Loertscher, D. (2005). Powering achievement: School library media programs make a difference: The evidence. (3rd ed.). Salt Lake City, UT: Hi Willow Research and Publishing.
  38. McAlpine, I. (2000). Collaborative learning online. Distance Education, 21(1), 66-80.
  39. Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  40. Moore, M.G. (1973). Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 44(12), 661-679.
  41. Moore, M. (Ed.) (2007). Handbook of distance education, (2nd ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  42. Morris, S. (2002). Teaching and learning online: A step-by-step guide for designing an online K-12 school program. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press Inc.
  43. Noble, D.F. (2001). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  44. O’Dwyer, L., Carey, R. & Kleiman, G. (2007). A Study of the effectiveness of the Louisiana Algebra I online course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 289306.
  45. O'Haire, N., Froese-Germain, B., & Lane-De Baie, S. (2003). Virtual education, real educators: Issues in online learning. Ottawa, ON: The Canadian Teachers' Federation.
  46. Pape, L., Adams, R., & Ribeiro, C. (2005). The Virtual High School: Collaboration and online professional development. In Z.L. Berge& T. Clark (Eds.), Virtual schools: Planning for success (pp. 118-132). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  47. Postman, N. (2003). Questioning media. In M.S. Pittinsky (Ed.), The wired tower: Perspectives on the impact of the internet on higher education (pp. 181-200). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
  48. Rice, K.L. (2006). A comprehensive look at distance education in the K-12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 425-448.
  49. Roblyer, M.D. (2005). Who plays well in the virtual sandbox? Characteristics of successful online students and teachers. SIGTel Bulletin, 2.
  50. Rourke, L. & Szabo, M. (2002). A content analysis of the Journal of Distance Education 1986 – 2001. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1).
  51. Rovai, A.P. (2001). Classroom community at a distance: A comparative analysis of two ALNbased university programs. Internet and Higher Education, 4(2), 105-118.
  52. Russell, G. (2001). Virtual schools and educational futures. Educational Technology, 41(6), 5557.
  53. Russell, G. (2002). Ethical concerns about virtual schools. Journal of Religious and Theological Information, 5(1), 31-47.
  54. Russell, G. (2003). The potential and problems of virtual schooling. The Welsh Journal of Education, 12(1), 40-52.
  55. Russell, G. (2004). The advantages and disadvantages of virtual schools. ICT in Education Journal, 7(1), 6-8.
  56. Russell, G. (2005). The distancing question in online education. Innovate, 1(4). Retrieved July 4, 2005, from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article & Id=13
  57. Stacey, E. (1999). Collaborative learning in an online environment. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2).
  58. Thomas, W.R. (1999). Essential elements for web-based courses for high school students. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board. Retrieved July 4, 2005, from http://www.sreb.org/programs/EdTech/pubs/EssentialElements/EssentialElements.pdf
  59. Thomas, W.R. (2000). Essential principles of quality: Guidelines for web-based courses for middle and high schools. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board. Retrieved July 4, 2005, from http://www.sreb.org/programs/EdTech/pubs/EssentialPrincipals/EssentialPrinciples.pdf
  60. Thomas, W.R. (2003). Essential principles of high-quality online teaching: Guidelines for evaluating K-12 online teachers. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board. Retrieved July 4,
  61. Tinker, R., & Haavind, S. (1997). Netcourses and netseminars: Current practice and new designs. Concord, MA: Concord Consortium. Retrieved April 17, 2000, from http://www.corcord.org/pubs/pdf/netcours.pdf
  62. Vail, K. (2001). Online learning grows up: No longer an experiment, virtual school is here to stay. Electronic School. Retrieved July 31, 2005, from http://www.electronicschool.com/2001/09/0901f1.html
  63. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
  64. Watson, J. & Ryan, J. (2007). Keeping pace with k-12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. AT& T Foundation.
  65. Zucker, A. (2005). A study of student interaction and collaboration in the Virtual High School. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
  66. Zucker, A., & Kozma, R. (2003). The Virtual High School: Teaching generation V. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

Also Read

Related Collections