You are here:

Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education
ARTICLE

, Athabasca University ; , Los Angeles Unified School District ; , JSTOR ; , University of Ottawa ; , Anadolu University ; , University of Massachusetts Boston ; , Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina

IRRODL Volume 12, Number 7, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

In this paper, we look at how the massive open online course (MOOC) format developed by connectivist researchers and enthusiasts can help analyze the complexity, emergence, and chaos at work in the field of education today. We do this through the prism of a MobiMOOC, a six-week course focusing on mLearning that ran from April to May 2011. MobiMOOC embraced the core MOOC components of self-organization, connectedness, openness, complexity, and the resulting chaos, and, as such, serves as an interesting paradigm for new educational orders that are currently emerging in the field. We discuss the nature of participation in MobiMOOC, the use of mobile technology and social media, and how these factors contributed to a chaotic learning environment with emerging phenomena. These emerging phenomena resulted in a transformative educational paradigm.

Citation

de Waard, I., Abajian, S., Gallagher, M., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A. & Rodriguez, O. (2011). Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(7), 94-115. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved June 5, 2023 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Abel. R. (2005). Implementing best practices in online learning. Educause quarterly: The IT Practitioner’s Journal, 28(3), 75–77.
  2. Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  3. Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/ View/902/1664
  4. Bertuglia, C.S. (2005). Nonlinearity, chaos and complexity: The dynamics of natural and social systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Cafolla, R. (2008). Industrial age paradigm vs. Information age (chaos) paradigm. Retrieved from http://www.coe.fau.edu/faculty/cafolla/courses/eme6051/chaos/Applications.htm
  6. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (1997). Cognition, complexity, and teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 105–125.
  7. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2008). Complexity as a theory of education. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry 5(2), 33–44. Retrieved from http://nitinat.library.ubc.ca/ojs/ Index.php/tci
  8. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2010). “If things were simple...”: complexity in education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16(4), 856–860.
  9. Derrida, J. (1992). Acts of literature. New York: Routledge.
  10. De Waard, I., & Kiyan, C. (2010, October). Mobile learning for HIV healthcare workers’ training in resource-limited settings. Paper presented at mLearn 2010, Malta.
  11. Donato, R. (1994) Collective scaffolding. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskyan approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  12. Downes, S. (2007). What connectivism is. Paper presented at the Connectivism Conference, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html
  13. Farrior, M. (2005). Best practices for building online communities between researchers and practitioners. Retrieved from https://www.ohrd.wisc.edu/home/portals/0/ Bestpracticesforbuildingonlinecommunities. Doc
  14. Iannone, R. (1995). Chaos theory and its implications for curriculum and teaching. Education, 115(4), 541–547.
  15. Kelland, J.H. (2006). Constructivist theories and online learning best practices: A discourse analysis. Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education (CASAE)
  16. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2007). Designing for mobile and wireless learning. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (pp. 183–
  17. Laurillard, D. (2007). Pedagogical forms for mobile learning. In N. Pachler (Ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (pp. 153–175). London: WLE Centre, IoE.
  18. Mackness, J., Mak, S., & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Networked Learning, Aalborg, Denmark. Retrieved from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/abstracts/PDFs/Mackness.pdf
  19. McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf
  20. McNeely, I., & Wolverton, L. (2008). Reinventing knowledge, from Alexandria to the Internet. New York: Norton& Company.
  21. Minsk, M. (1986). The society of the mind. New York: Simon& Schuster.
  22. Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view. Belworth, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
  23. Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34–51.
  24. Özdamar Keskin, N., & Metcalf, D. (2011). The current perspectives, theories and practices of mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 202–208.
  25. Ravenscroft, A. (2011). Dialogue and connectivism: A new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index. Php/irrodl/article/view/934
  26. Reigeluth, C.M. (2004). Chaos theory and the sciences of complexity: Foundations for transforming education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
  27. Rosenberg, M.J. (2006). Beyond e-learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  28. Sharples, M. (2005). Learning as conversation: Transforming education in the mobile age. Proceedings of Conference on Seeing, Understanding, and Learning in the Mobile Age, Budapest, Hungary (pp. 147–152). Retrieved from http://www.eee.bham.ac.uk/sharplem/Papers/Theory%20of%20learning%20Budapest.pdf
  29. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
  30. Traxler, J. (2009). The evolution of mobile learning. In R. Guy (Ed.), The evolution of mobile teaching and learning (pp. 1–14). Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.
  31. Traxler, J. (2010). The learner experience of mobiles, mobility and connectedness. Paper published by ELESIG (Evaluation of Learners’ Experiences of e-Learning Special Interest Group). Retrieved from http://www.helenwhitehead.com/elesig/ELESIG%20Mobilities%20ReviewPDF.pdf
  32. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In L.S. Vygotsky (Ed.), Mind in society (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  33. Wheatley, M.J. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  34. Winters, N. (2007). What is mobile learning? In M. Sharples (Ed.), Big issues in mobile learning (pp. 7–11). Nottingham, UK: LSRI, University of Nottingham.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

Also Read

Related Collections