You are here:

A review of trends in distance education scholarship at research universities in North America, 1998-2007
ARTICLE

, , , Brigham Young University

IRRODL Volume 11, Number 3, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

This article explores and summarizes trends in research and scholarship over the last decade (i.e., 1998-2007) for students completing dissertations and theses in the area of distance education. The topics addressed, research designs utilized, and data collection and analysis methods used were compiled and analyzed. Results from this study indicate that most of the distance education research conducted by graduate students in this period of time has been descriptive, often addressing the perceptions, concerns, and satisfaction levels of various stakeholders with a particular distance education experience. Studies of this type typically used self-report surveys and analyzed the data using descriptive statistics. Validating the concern of many distance education scholars, there was a lack of graduate student research aimed at developing a theory base in distance education. On a positive note, projects directly comparing distance education with traditional face-to-face classrooms to determine the merit of specific programs declined significantly in 2007 as compared to 1998. This result might indicate that distance learning is becoming accepted as a viable and important educational experience in its own right. Another encouraging finding was the decreased emphasis on studies focused on technology issues, such as those analyzing the quality of distance education technology and questioning educators’ ability to provide an acceptable technology-enabled distance learning experience.

Citation

Davies, R., Howell, S. & Petrie, J. (2010). A review of trends in distance education scholarship at research universities in North America, 1998-2007. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 42-56. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved June 28, 2022 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
  2. Beaudoin, M.F. (2004). Distance education leadership: Appraising theory and advancing practice. In Reflections on research, faculty and leadership in distance education. ASF Series, Volume 8 (pp. 91-101). Oldenburg, Germany: Oldenburg University Press.
  3. Berge, Z., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 5-19.
  4. Bernard, R.M., Abrami, P.C., Lou, Y., & Borokhovski, E. (2004). A methodological morass: How can we improve the quality of quantitative research in distance education? Distance Education, 25(2), 176-198.
  5. Garrison, D.R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E–learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London, UK: Routledge/Falmer.
  6. Gaytan, J. (2007). Vision shaping the future of online education: Understanding its historical evolution, implications, and assumptions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(2). Doi: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer102/gaytan102.htm
  7. Lee, Y., Driscoll, M.P., & Nelson, D.W. (2004). The past, present, and future of research in distance education: Results of a content analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 225-241.
  8. Lewis, L., Snow, K., & Farris, E. (1999). Distance education at postsecondary education institutions: 1997-98 (National Center for Education Statistics 2000-013). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
  9. Lindsay, N., Wright, T., & Howell, S. (2004). Coming of age: The rise of research in distance education. Continuing Higher Education Review, 68, 96-103.
  10. McMillan-Culp, K., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2005). A retrospective on twenty years of educational technology policy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 279-307.
  11. Meyer, K.A. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on online learning. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Series, 29(4). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED470042)
  12. Meyer, K.A. (2004). Putting the distance learning comparison study in perspective: Its 54
  13. Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  14. Naidu, S. (2005). Researching distance education and e-learning. In C. Howard, J.V. Boettcher, L. Justice, K. Schenk, P. Rogers, & G.A. Berg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (Vol. 4, pp. 1564-1572). Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc.
  15. Parsad, B., & Lewis, L. (2008). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006–07 (National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences 2009-044). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  16. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
  17. Reynolds, C.R., Livingston, R.B., & Willson, V. (2006). Measurement and assessment in education. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  18. Ritzhaupt, A.D., Stewart, M., Smith, P., & Barron, A.E. (2010). An investigation of distance education in North American research literature using co-word analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/763/1516.
  19. Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.
  20. Russell, T.L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Chapel Hill, North Carolina State University: Office of Instructional Telecommunications.
  21. Saba, F. (2000). Research in distance education: A status report. International Review of Research in Open
  22. Sherry, A.C. (2003). Quality and its measurement in distance education. In M.G. Moore& W.G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 435-360). Mahwah, NJ:
  23. Tallent-Runnels, M.K., Thomas, J.A., Lan, W.Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T.C., Shaw, S.M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93-135.
  24. Tucker, S. (2001). Distance education: Better, worse, or as good as traditional education? Online
  25. Zawacki-Richter, O., Baecker, E.M., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000–2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/741/1461.
  26. Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H.S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836-1884.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links

Also Read

Related Collections