An Engagement Model for Learning: Providing a Framework to Identify Technology Services
ARTICLE
I Hawryszkiewycz, University of Technology, Australia
IJELLO Volume 3, Number 1, ISSN 1552-2237 Publisher: Informing Science Institute
Abstract
The paper introduces the concept of engagement as a way of modeling and implementing flexible learning processes. The paper particularly addresses new learning demands, such as personalized learning, and defines ways of defining learning processes to support such new demands. It then shows how engagements can be used to provide guidelines for selecting information technology services that meet such new demands.
Citation
Hawryszkiewycz, I. (2007). An Engagement Model for Learning: Providing a Framework to Identify Technology Services. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 3(1), 219-228. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/44807/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Baylor, A., & Kim, Y. (2003). Validating pedagogical agent roles: Expert, motivator, and mentor. EDMedia 2003, 15th. Annual Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Hawaii, June 2003. 2003.
- Bednar, P., Eglin, R., & Welch, C. (2007). Contextual inquiry: A systematic support for student engagement through reflection. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 45-55.
- Harman, K. & Koohang, A. (2005). Discussion board: A learning object. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1, 67-77. Available at http://ijklo.org/Volume1/v1p067077Harman.pdf
- Hawryszkiewycz, I.T. (2005). A metamodel for modeling collaborative systems. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, Spring, 63-72.
- Hawryszkiewycz, I.T. & Lin, A. (2003). Process knowledge support for emergent processes. Proceedings of the Second IASTED International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Scottsdale, Arizona, November, 2003, pp. 83-87.
- Hezemans, M. & Ritzen, M. (2002). Learning environments: Three types of learning environment. Telelearning: The challenge for the third millennium, IFIP Congress, Montreal, August 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 185-192.
- Jonassen, D. (1999). Constructivist learning environments on the Web: Engaging students in meaningful Learning. EdTech99.
- Koper, R. (2000). Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: The pedagogical model behind EML. Retrieved from http://eml.ou.nl/articles Pan, W. & Hawryszkiewycz, I.T. (2006). Assisting learners to dynamically adjust learning processes through software agents. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies, 2(2), 1-15.
- Petraglia, J. (1998). The real world on a short term lease: The (mis)application of constructivism to the design of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 53-65.
- Wang, F.H. (2005). Developing web-based virtual classroom based on IMS learning design specification. Proceedings of the Fourth IASTED International Conference on Web-based Education, Grindelwald, pp. 267-272.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Modalities of Using Learning Objects for Intelligent Agents in Learning
Dorian Stoilescu, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Canada
Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Vol. 4, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2008) pp. 49–64
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.