IJELLO Volume 7, Number 1, ISSN 1552-2237 Publisher: Informing Science Institute
The implementation of innovative technologies in school is a complex process that enquires creating a pedagogical, technological, and managerial systemic change in the school-culture – a process that usually fails to meet the high expectations and to create the systemic change. In light of the many recent studies, which indicate that teachers' perception and attitudes play a pivotal role of in the success or the failure of technology-implementation projects, the present study explores the teachers' perceptions and attitudes towards the implementation of an innovative technology (smart class) in school by analyzing the inter-relationships between the major pedagogical factors that act in a technology-implementation process: (1) the teachers' attitudes towards change, (2) the teachers' technological-pedagogical content knowledge, and (3) the teachers' perception of school as a learning organization. Data was gathered using questionnaires that captured the teachers' level of “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge” (TPACK), their perception of school as a learning organization, and their attitude towards change. Findings indicate a positive correlation between TPACK and the teachers' attitudes towards change, and a positive correlation between teachers' attitudes towards change and their perception of school as a learning organization. Participants who scored high in TPACK and in perceiving their school as a learning organization also scored high in their positive attitudes towards change. Key words: TPACK, attitude; teacher's attitudes towards change, school as a learning organization, innovative technology, educational technology, smart class; educational change I
Avidov-Ungar, O. & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2011). [Chais] Teachers in a World of Change: Teachers' Knowledge and Attitudes towards the Implementation of Innovative Technologies in Schools. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7(1), 291-303. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved January 23, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/44745/.
- Archambault, L. & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.
- Avidov-Ungar, O. (2010). "Islands of innovation" or "Comprehensive innovation". Assimilating educational technology in teaching, learning, and management: A case study of school networks in Israel. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6, 259-280. Retrieved from http://www.ijello.org/Volume6/IJELLOv6p259-280Avidov704.pdf Becker, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution: Teaching with IWBs. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
- Becker, H. (2001). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, University of California, Seattle.
- Cibulka, J., Coursey, S., Nakayama, M., Price, J., & Stewart, S. (2000). Schools as Learning Organizations: A Review of the Literature. The Creation of High-Performance Schools through Organizational and Individual Learning. (Part One of Three). For full text see http://www.northyorks.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=13127 & P=0 ]
- Coffman, T. (2009). Getting to the heart of technology integration: Virginia's instructional technology resource teacher program. Learning and Learning with Technology, 36(7), 20-23.
- Collinson, V. (2010). To learn or not to learn: A potential organizational learning gap among school systems? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(2), 190 – 219.
- Coppieters, P. (2005). Turning schools into learning organizations. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 129-139.
- Cox, S., & Graham, C.R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60-69.
- Cuban, L. (1988). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(5), 340-344.
- Cunningham, C.A. (2009). Transforming schooling through technology: Twenty-first-century approaches to participatory learning. Education and Culture, 25(2), 46-61.
- Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the conditions for teachers' professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 423-443.
- Day, C., & Smethem, L. (2009).The effects of reform: Have teachers really lost their sense of professionalism? Journal of Educational Change, 10(2-3), 141-157.
- De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2005). Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organizational change to e-leaning implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 81-95.
- Del Val, M.P., & Fuentes, C.M. (2003). Resistance to change: A literature review and empirical study. Management Decision, 41(12), 148-155.
- Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319-346.
- Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
- Eshet, Y. (2007). Teaching online: Survival skills for the effective teacher. Inroads-The SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(2), 16-20.
- Fauske, J.R., & Raybould, R. (2005). Organizational learning theory in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(1), 22-40.
- Fullan, M. (2000). The meaning of educational change: A quarter of a century of learning. In A. Hargreaves, A. Liberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds), International handbook of educational change. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). What's worth fighting for in your school? New York: Teachers College Press.
- Fullan, M., & Smith, G. (1999). Technology and the problem of change. Available at http://www.michaelfullan.ca/Articles_98-99/12_99.pdf Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124-156.
- Halverson, R., & Smith, A. (2009). How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 49-55.
- Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C.D. Maddux (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
- Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teacher's technological pedagogical content knowledge: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London and New York: Routledge.
- Kent, T.W., & MacNergney, R.F. (1999). Will technology really change education? California: Corwin Press.
- Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical knowledge. In AACTE (Eds.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group for the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education. Teachers in a World of Change
- Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
- Kontoghiorghes, C., Awbre, S., & Feurig, P.L. (2005). Examining the relationship between learning organization characteristics and change adaptation, innovation, and organizational performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly Journal, 16(2), 185-212.
- Korland, H. (2000). Elementary school as a learning organization. M.A., dissertation, Faculty of Education, Haifa University. [in Hebrew].
- Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2008). Learning about system renewal. Educational Management Administration& Leadership, 36(2), 289-303.
- Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support development transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 591-596.
- Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Forkosh, B.A., & Tubin, D. (2004). Sustainability, scalability and transferability of ICT-based pedagogical innovations in Israeli schools. Education, Communication& Information, 4(1), 71-82.
- Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Lahav, O., & Oren, A. (2000). Web-based learning environments: Current pedagogical and technological state. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 55-77.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
- Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
- Ogobonna, E. & Harris L.C. (2003). Innovation organizational structure and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(5), 512-533.
- Polly, D., & Mims, C. (2009). Designing professional development to support teachers' TPACK and integration of Web 2.0 technologies. In T.T. Kidd& I. Chen (Eds.), Wired for learning: Web 2.0 guide for educators. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
- Sandy, L.D. (2010). Social capital, empowerment and educational change: A scenario of permeation of one-to-one technology in school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(4), 284-295.
- Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.
- Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn. A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday/Currency
- Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
- Tas, A. (2005). Organizational learning in primary schools. Journal of Educational Reform, 14(3), 334350.
- Tatnall, A., & Davey, B. (2003). ICT and training: A proposal for an ecological model of innovation. Educational Technology and Society, 6(1), 14-17.
- Vaillant, D. (2005). Educational reform and the role of teachers. Prelac Journal, 1, 38-51.
- Wallace, R.M. (2004). A framework for understanding teaching with the internet. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 447-488.
- Way, J., Lilley, E., Ruster, C., Johnco, S., Mauric, L., & Ochs, L. (2009). Symposium: Interactive whiteboards and pedagogy in primary classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Australian Association for Research in Education. Canberra, Australia. Retrieved December 1, 2010, from http://www.aare.edu.au/09pap/way091149.pdf
- Yu-Lin, W., & Ellinger, A.D. (2008). Organizational learning and innovation performance: A review of the literature and the development of a conceptual framework and research hypotheses. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference in the Americas, Panama City, FL.
- Zhao, J., & Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2009). School innovative management model and strategies: The perspective of organizational learning. Information Systems Management, 26(3) 241-251.
- Zimmerman, J. (2006). Why some teachers resist change and what principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90(3), 238-249.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.