You are here:

Integrating Information and Communication Technology in the Classroom:
ARTICLE

CJLT Volume 30, Number 2, ISSN 1499-6677 e-ISSN 1499-6677 Publisher: Canadian Network for Innovation in Education

Full Text

Abstract

The discourse about information technology is often overlooked by researchers and scholars as a means of understanding the recent process of computerization in education. The research explores this phenomenon through a comparative discourse analysis of primary and secondary school teachers and promoters of ICT integration. The results show that promoters tend to view ICT as a way of transforming education whereas teachers see it only as a means to an end. The former's vision is borrowed from a prospective current of thought, a vision of social changes based on technological advances; the latter's considers only the needs of the students and the practical ways to respond to them. The research shows that teachers are not opposed to ICT integration; they're interested in effective ways to implement learning. The organizational context into which ICT is integrated is also a major impediment when it comes to changing the teacher's practice.

Citation

Sasseville, B. & Sasseville, B. (2004). Integrating Information and Communication Technology in the Classroom:. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 30(2),. Canadian Network for Innovation in Education. Retrieved February 21, 2020 from .

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Adam, J-M. (1990). Éléments de linguistique textuelle. Théorie et pratique de l'analyse textuelle. Liège: Mardaga.
  2. Alexander, M.S. & Petkanas, W. (1998). Reflections of education: a case study of educational technology advertisements. New Jersey Journal of Communication, 6(2), 185-198.
  3. Angenot, M. (1982). La parole pamphlétaire. Contribution à la typologie des discours modernes. Paris: Payot.
  4. Aquien, M. & Molinié, G. (1996). Dictionnaire de rhétorique et de poétique. Paris: Librairie Générale Française.
  5. Armstrong, A. & Casement, C. (1998). The child and the machine. Why computers may put our children's education at risk. Toronto: Key Porter Books.
  6. Bakhtine, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  7. Bigum, C. (1997). Teachers and computers: In control or being controlled? Australian Journal of Education, 41(3), 247-261.
  8. Carugati, F. & Tomasetto, C. (2002). Le corps enseignant face aux nouvelles technologies de l'information et de la communication: un défi incontournable. Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 28(2), 305-324.
  9. Clegg, S. (2001). Theorising the machine: gender, education and computing. Gender and Education, 13(3), 307-324.
  10. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines. The classroom use of technology since 1920. New-York: Teachers College Press.
  11. Cuban, L. (1997). Salle de classe contre ordinateur: vainqueur la salle de classe. Recherche et Formation, 26, 11-29.
  12. Cuban, L. (1999, February). Why are most teachers infrequent and restrained users of computers? BCTF Public Education Conference. Technology: Public Education in a Wired World. Vancouver.
  13. Dawes, L. & Selwyn, N. (1999). Teaching with the dream machines: The representation of teachers and computers in information technology advertising. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 8 (3), 289-304.
  14. Deci, E.L., Koestner, R. & Ryan, R.M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1-27.
  15. Fabos, B. & Young, M.D. (1999). Telecommunication in the classroom: rhetoric versus reality. Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 217-259.
  16. Fossion, A. & Laurent, J.P. (1981). Pour comprendre les lectures nouvelles. Bruxelles: DeBoeck/Duculot.
  17. Franklin, B.M. (1999). Discourse, rationality and educational research: a historical perspective of RER. Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 347-363.
  18. Garnham, N. (2000). La théorie de la société de l'information en tant qu'idéologie: une critique. Réseaux, 101, 53-91.
  19. Gormly, E.K. (1996). Critical perspectives on the evolution of technology in American public schools. Journal of Educational Thought, 30(3), 263-286.
  20. Hanson, K. (1997). Gender, discourse and technology. Center for Equity and Diversity Working Paper 5. Newton: Education Development Center.
  21. Harris, S. (1999). Secondary school students' use of computers at home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 331-339.
  22. Hawkridge, D., Jaworski, J. & McMahon, H. (1990). Computers in third-world schools. Examples, experience and issues. London: McMillan Pub.
  23. Hidi, S. & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: a critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151-179.
  24. Hyslop-Margison, E.J. (2000). The market economy discourse on education: interpretation, impact and resistance. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46(3), 203-213.
  25. Karsenti, T., Savoie-Zajc, L. & Larose, F. (2001). Les futurs enseignants confrontés aux TIC: changements dans l'attitude, la motivation et les pratiques pédagogiques. Éducation et Francophonie. 29(1).
  26. Karsenti, T., Peraya, D. & Viens, J. (2002). Bilan et prospectives de la recherche sur la formation des maîtres à l'intégration pédagogique des TIC. Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 28(2), 459-470.
  27. Larose, F., David, R., Lafrance, S & Cantin, J. (1999). Les technologies de l'information et de la communication en pédagogie universitaire et en formation à la profession enseignante: mythes et réalités. Perspectives d'avenir en éducation, 27 (1).
  28. Lusalusa, S. (2000). Représentations des élèves sur l'intégration des nouvelles technologies à l'école: une étude de cas. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis, 37(1), 51-67.
  29. Maingueneau, D. (1987). Nouvelles tendances en analyse du discours. Paris: Hachette. Conseil supérieur de l'éducation. 2000. Éducation et nouvelles technologies: Pour une intégration réussie dans l'enseignement et l'apprentissage. Rapport annuel 1999-2000 sur l'état et les besoins de l'éducation. Québec: Les Publications du Québec.
  30. Postman, N. (2000). Will our children only inherit the wind? Theory and Research in Social Education, 28 (4), 580-586.
  31. Powell, J.V. (1999). Interrelationships between importance, knowledge and attitude of the inexperienced. Computers and Education, 32 , 127-136.
  32. Reboul, O. (1984). Le langage de l'éducation. Analyse du discours pédagogique. Paris: PUF. Reynolds, D; Treharne, D. & Tripp, H. (2003) ICT-The hopes and the reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (2), 151-167.
  33. Russell, T.L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. North Carolina: NCSU Office of Instructional Telecommunications.
  34. Sasseville, B. (2002). Le discours des enseignantes et enseignants du primaire et secondaire face à l'intégration dans la pratique professionnelle des technologies de l'information et des communications. Ph.D. Thesis, Rimouski, Université du Québec à Rimouski.
  35. Selwyn, N. (1999). Students' attitudes towards computers in sixteen to nineteen education. Education and Information Technologies, 4(2), 129-141.
  36. Stepulevage, L. (2001). Gender/technology relations: complicating the gender binary. Gender and Education, Tyack, D. Et Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. A century of public school reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  37. Volman, M. & Van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: the second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613-634.
  38. Yeaman, A.R. (1997). The discourse on technology. In Branch, R.M. & Minor, B.B. (Eds.) Educational Media and Technology Yearbook. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited Pub.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections