You are here:

Encouraging Active Participant Engagement in the Evaluation of Online Conferencing PROCEEDINGS

, , , Australian Digital Futures Institute, University of Southern Queensland, Australia

Global Learn, in Online, Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Abstract

Online conferencing has emerged as an effective solution for offering professional development and networking opportunities without needing to travel. The evaluation of online learning events held using online conferencing technologies is still highly reliant on summative assessment measures. This paper reports on the evaluation of an online conference using an adapted version of the new learning methodology. Data was collected from a range of qualitative and quantitative sources that were both subjective and objective to provide a holistic overview of conference participation and participant perceptions. The evaluation also aimed at actively engaging participants in the evaluation process. The evaluation process was conducted in a transparent and interactive manner and provided summative feedback as well as real-time information to conference organisers during the conference proceedings.

Citation

Murphy, A., Antonio, A. & Reushle, S. (2012). Encouraging Active Participant Engagement in the Evaluation of Online Conferencing. In Proceedings of Global Learn 2012: Global Conference on Learning and Technology (pp. 42-47). Online,: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 17, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Anderson, L., & Anderson, T. (2009). Online professional development conferences: An effective, economical and eco-friendly option. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 35(2).
  2. Anderson, L., & Anderson, T. (2010). Online conferences: Professional development for a networked era. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  3. Chapman, D., Wiessner, C., Storberg-Walker, J., & Hatcher, T. (2007). New learning: a different way of approaching conference evaluation. Knowledge Management Research& Practice, 5(4), 261-270.
  4. Hernshaw, D. (2010). Towards an objective approach to the evaluation of videoconferencing. Innovations in Education& Training International, 37(3), 210-217.
  5. Java, A., Finn, T., Song, X., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. Paper presented at the proceedings of the Joint 9th WEBKDD & 1st SNA-KDD Workshop 2007, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
  6. Kimura, B., & Ho, C. (2008). Online conferences and workshops: Affordable and ubiquitous learning opportunities for faculty development. Proceeding from Distance Learning and internet conference 2008, Tokyo, Japan.-47 DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides