You are here:

Educational Framework for Adoption of Vocabulary Based on Wikipedia Linkage and Spaced Learning PROCEEDINGS

, Aalto University School of Science, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Finland

Global Learn, in Online, Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Abstract

We propose a new educational framework supporting learners in adoption of vocabulary and knowledge for various personalized and engaging pedagogic purposes. The most essential concepts of learning topic are linked based on the shortest connecting paths in hyperlink network of Wikipedia encyclopedia assisted with Wiktionary dictionary. In resulting pedagogic conceptual network learner traverses links along learning path generated by method in sequential process having tailored variation and repetition computed based on theory of spaced learning. The learning path is shown to learner as sequence of compact relation statements extracted from sentences surrounding hyperlinks in Wikipedia articles, supplied with set of visualizations based on main verb identified in them. Based on framework we have implemented prototype tool and promising experiments in educational setting indicated valuable support for adoption of new knowledge.

Citation

Lahti, L. (2012). Educational Framework for Adoption of Vocabulary Based on Wikipedia Linkage and Spaced Learning. In Proceedings of Global Learn 2012: Global Conference on Learning and Technology (pp. 8-13). Online,: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 22, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage, and word lists. In Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (eds.), Vocabulary: description, acquisition, pedagogy. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 6-19.
  2. Nation, P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review 63, 1, 59-82.
  3. Lehr, F., Osborn, J. & Hiebert, E. (2004). Research-based practices in early reading series: a focus on vocabulary. Regional Educational Laboratory, Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. Http://www.prel.org/products/re_/ES0419.htm
  4. Nagy, W., & Anderson, R (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3).
  5. Chujo, K. (2004). Measuring vocabulary levels of English textbooks and tests using a BNC lemmatized high frequency word list. In Nakamura, J., Inoue, N., & Tabata, T. (eds.), English corpora under Japanese eyes. Rodopi, Netherlands, 231-249.
  6. Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text lexis is essential for comprehension? In Lauren, C., & Nordman, M. (eds.), Special language: from humans thinking to thinking machines. Multilingual Matters, 316-323.
  7. Hsu, W. (2009). College English textbooks for general purposes: a corpus-based analysis of lexical coverage. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 6(1), 42-62.
  8. Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in aForeign Language, 17(1).
  9. McKeown, M., Beck, I., Omanson, R., & Pople, M. (1985). Some effects of the nature and frequency of vocabulary instruction on the knowledge and use of words. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 522-535.
  10. Cepeda, N., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J., and Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380.
  11. Anderson, N. (1999). Improving reading speed. English Teaching Forum, 37(2).
  12. DuBay, W. (2004). The principles of readability. Impact Information, Costa Mesa, California, USA.
  13. Doidge, N.(2007).The brain that changes itself: stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of neuroscience.Viking Press,USA.
  14. Harvey, C., & Svoboda, K. (2007). Locally dynamic synaptic learning rules in pyramidal neuron dendrites. Nature, 450(7173).
  15. Kandel, E. (2001). The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialog between genes and synapses. Nobel Lecture, 8 December 2000. Bioscience Reports, 21(5).
  16. Fields, R. (2005). Making memories stick. Scientific American, 292 (February 2005), 74-81.
  17. Vlach, H., & Sandhofer, C. (2012). Distributing learning over time: the spacing effect in children’s acquisition and generalization of science concepts. Child Development, 83, 1137-1144.
  18. Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. The International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105-122.
  19. Bauer, D. (2007). Learning the semantics of Wikipedia hyperlinks. Bachelor thesis. University of Osnabrück, Germany.
  20. Kuhn, T. (2009). How controlled English can improve semantic wikis. Proc. Fourth Semantic Wiki Workshop (SemWiki 2009).
  21. Lahti, L. (2011). Educational concept mapping method based on high-frequency words and Wikipedia linkage. Proc. Fourth International Conference on Internet Technologies and Applications, Glyndwr University, UK. Alldcbblxlbzy wtp vlcyptybl.
  22. Wozniak, P., & Gorzelanczyk, E. (1994). Optimization of repetition spacing in the practice of learning. Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis, 54: 59-62.
  23. Pavlik, P., & Anderson, J. (2008). Using a model to compute the optimal schedule of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(2), 101-117.
  24. Bayetto, A. (2010). The words children write-beyond the early years. Summary report of the Oxford Wordlist, stage 2 research study. Oxford University Press Australia, Australia. Http://www.oxfordwordlist.com/pages/search.asp

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides