You are here:

Online Socialization through Social Software and Networks from an Educational Perspective

, Ankara University, Turkey

International Journal on E-Learning Volume 14, Number 2, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA


The potential represented by the usage of Internet-based communication technologies in parallel with e-instruction is enabling learners to cooperate and collaborate throughout the world. However, an important dimension, namely the socialization of learners through online dialogues via e-mail, discussion forums, chats, blogs, wikis and virtual classes, is lacking in the literature. Hence, the aim of this research study has been to investigate; the potential ways in which socialization has been conceived, the effects of educators (in terms of planning and intervention) upon the online environment; and the success indicators for socialization in online settings. The findings of the study show that online socialization depends on the three aspects of student behaviours, content and the learning environment. Moreover, design and management of the social environment, together with the learning tasks and activities, plays an important role in the communication, interaction collaboration levels of students. Hence, it is concluded that evidence within the education system should be sought to make effective use of social environments, introducing such environments to students, being role models for students, effectively designing and managing such environments, and making students more social than ever.


Gülbahar, Y. (2015). Online Socialization through Social Software and Networks from an Educational Perspective. International Journal on E-Learning, 14(2), 199-222. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 16, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of Educational Theory for Online Learning. In Anderson, T. (Ed.) (2nd ed.). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. AU Press: Athabasca University.
  2. Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a Theory of Online Learning. In Anderson, T. (Ed.) (2nd ed.). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. AU Press: Athabasca University.
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
  4. Beckett, G.H., Amaro-Jiménez, C. & Beckett, K.S. (2010). Students’ use of asynchronous discussions for academic discourse socialization. Distance Education, 31(3), 315-335.
  5. Burke, M., Kraut, R. & Joyce, E. (2010). Membership claims and requests: Conversationlevel newcomer socialization strategies in online groups. Small Group Research, 41(1) 4-40.
  6. Dabbagh, N. (2000). Online Discussion Protocols and Rubrics. Retrieved August 5, 2012, from
  7. Edirisingha, P., Nie, M., Pluciennik, M. & Young, R. (2009). Socialization for learning at a distance in a 3-D multi-user virtual environment. British Journal of educational Technology, 40(3), 458-479.
  8. Garrison, D.R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. Pp. 61-72.
  9. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
  10. Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M. & Fung, T. (2004). Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 8(2), 61 – 74.
  11. Gunawardena, C.N. & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11, 3, 8–26.
  12. Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A. & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
  13. Hill, J.R., Song, L. & West, R.E. (2009). Social Learning Theory and Web-Based Learning Environments: A Review of Research and Discussion of Implications. The American Journal of Distance Education, 23, 88–103.
  14. Holley, K.A. & Taylor, B.J. (2009). Undergraduate Student Socialization and Learning in an Online Professional Curriculum. Innovations in Higher Education, 33, 257–269.
  15. Huang, W.D. & Nakazawa, K. (2010). An empirical analysis on how learners interact in wiki in a graduate level online course. Interactive Learning Environments. 18(3), 233-244.
  16. Irwin, C. & Berge, Z. (2006). Socialization in the Online Classroom. E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (e-JIST), 9(1). Retrieved August 5, 2012, from
  17. Jones, N., Peachey, P. (2005). The Development of Socialization in an On-line Learning Environment, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(3). Retrieved August 5, 2012, from
  18. Mahfouz, A.Y., Philaretou, A.G. & Theocharous, A. (2008). Virtual social interactions: Evolutionary, social psychological and technological perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 3014-3026.
  19. McCarthy, J.W., Smith, J.L. & DeLuca, D. (2010). Using online discussion boards with large and small groups to enhance learning of assistive technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22, 95-113.
  20. Minocha, S. (2009). A case-study based investigation of students’ experiences with social software tools. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 15(3), 245-265.
  21. Moore, M.G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6. Moore, M.G. Ve Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance Education: A Systems View (2nd Ed.). USA: Wadsworth Publishing.
  22. Picciano, A.G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 6(1). Retrieved August 5, 2012, from Groups/On-line%20Learning/Picciano%20(2002).pdf.
  23. Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Exploring social interaction in computer conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(3). 257-273.
  24. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Archer, W., & Garrison, D.R. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferences. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51–70.
  25. Salmon, G. (2002). Model of teaching and learning online through online networking. All things in moderation. Retrieved August 5, 2012, from
  26. Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley and Sons.
  27. So, H. & Brush, T.A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers& Education, 51(1), 318–336.
  28. Tee, M.Y. & Karney, D. (2010). Sharing and cultivating tacit knowledge in an online learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 5(4), 385-413.
  29. Tu, C.H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150.
  30. Watkins, R. (2007). Learning to e-Learn: Preparing e-Learners for Success. E-learning Guild ‘s Online Forums on Strategies and Techniques for Engaging and Retaining the e-Learner.
  31. Watson, J. & Gemin, B. (2008). Promising Practices in online learning: Socialization in Online Programs. North American Council for Online Learning (NACOL). Retrieved August 5, 2012, from PP_Socialization.pdf.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact