You are here:

Students´ perspectives on eLearning activities in person-centered, blended learning settings
PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Vienna, Austria

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Denver, Colorado, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-95-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

Blended or hybrid learning has become a frequent practice in higher education. In this article our primary research interest was to find out how students perceived eLearning activities in blended learning courses based on the person-centered paradigm. Through analyzing the content of a series of semi-structured interviews we found out that students appreciated eLearning activities that distinctly fitted in with face-to-face activities. Furthermore, they fa-vored the use of asynchronous media like the forum or online reaction sheets for eLearning thus complementing the highly synchronous “medium” in face-to face phases. The results of the study are discussed in light of the media synchronicity theory and, above all, as a practical resource for educators.

Citation

Haselberger, D. & Motschnig, R. (2012). Students´ perspectives on eLearning activities in person-centered, blended learning settings. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2012--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1978-1987). Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 28, 2022 from .

© 2012 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bauer, C., Derntl, M., Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Tausch, R. (2006). Promotive Activities in Face-to-Face and TechnologyEnhanced Learning Environments. The Person-Centered Journal, 13(1-2).
  2. Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-Centered Teacher-Student Relationships Are Effective: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 1 – 31.
  3. Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Speier, C., & Morris, M.G. (1998). Beyond Media Richness: An Empirical Test of Media Synchronicity Theory (pp. 48– 57). IEEE.
  4. Derntl, M. (2005). Patterns for Person-Centered e-Learning. Vienna: University of Vienna.
  5. Figl, K. (2010).Team and Media Competencies in Information Systems. M ü nchen: Oldenbourg Verlag.
  6. Haselberger, D. (2010). Person Centered Teacher Training Vorbereitung eines personenzentrierten Lernangebots in einem Technologie-erweiterten Kontext f ü r Studierende des Lehramts Informatik. Vienna: University of Vienna.
  7. Haselberger D., Motschnig R. (2011), Students’ perceptions on experiential learning in a person-centered atmosphere, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, English Edition, V.7, N.3, 63-74.
  8. Logar, S., Schrittesser, I., & Wenninger, B. (2006). Networked Learning 2006 Symposium 09. Professional Communities. Potentials and Limits of Blended Learning Scenarios (pp. 1– 8).
  9. Motschnig, R. & Figl, K. (2008). The Effects of Person Centered Education on Communication and Community Building. In J. Luca& E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008 (pp. 3843-3852). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  10. Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2004). An Action Research Based Framework for Researching and Assessing Blended Learning. In L. Cantoni& C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2004 (pp. 3976-3981). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  11. Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2005). Person-Centered e-Learning in Action: Can Technology Help to Manifest Person-Centered Values in Academic Environments. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 45(4), 503 – 530.
  12. Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Mallich, K. (2002). Learning at three levels: Web-support and experiential learning in project management. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Interactive Computer-Aided Learning. Presented at the Proceedings of the International Workshop on Interactive Computer-Aided Learning 2002, Villach.
  13. Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Mallich, K. (2004). Effects of Person-Centered Attitudes on Professional and Social Competence in a Blended Learning Paradigm. Educational Technology& Society, 7(4), 176– 192.
  14. Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Nykl, L. (2005). Was hat Carl Rogers Wirtschaftsinformatikern im Zeitalter des Internet zu sagen? Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 36 (1), 81-102.
  15. Motschnig, R., & Nykl, L. (2009). Konstruktive Kommunikation-Sich und andere verstehen durch personenzentrierte Interaktion. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta Verlag.
  16. Rogers, C.R. (1983). Freedom to Learn For The 80´ S. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  17. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I. And Booch, G. (1999). The Unified Modelling Language Reference Manual. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
  18. Tausch, R., & Tausch, A.-M. (1998). Erziehungs-Psychologie Begegnung von Person zu Person (11th ed.). Gö ttingen: Hogrefe-Verlag.
  19. Witzel, A. (1985). Das problemzentrierte Interview. In G. Jü ttermann (Ed.), Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp. 227– 256). Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Slides

Also Read

Related Collections