You are here:

Design Research Using Game Design as an Instructional Strategy

, , Wayne State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-92-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


Game design as an instructional tool can be expensive and time-consuming, as new software requires not only capital outlay but also training for teachers and students. Therefore, researchers have looked at low-tech design platforms to accomplish the same educational goals. One such way is to use Microsoft PowerPoint as a game design tool. In the second iteration of a design study, we have changed the way a homemade PowerPoint game project is implemented in an environmental chemistry classroom by providing more structure and more opportunities for instruction and feedback on the elements of the game design. We compared the performance of between groups who created games and groups who did not on tests for two separate units. Both test results showed statistically significant differences: in favor of the control group on the first unit and in favor of the group creating games for the second unit. Further research needs to examine which factors led to the significant findings in both instances.


Siko, J. & Barbour, M. (2012). Design Research Using Game Design as an Instructional Strategy. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2631-2637). Austin, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Aldrich, C. (2005). Learningbydoing: the essential guide to sumulations, computer games, and pedagogy in elearning and other educational experiences. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  2. Ambron, J. (1987). Writing to improve learning in biology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 16(4), 4.
  3. American Chemical Society. (2008). Chemistry in the Community (ChemCom): Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from & _pageLabel=PP_ARTICLEMAIN & Node_id=557
  4. Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Hurley, M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The Effects of School-Based Writing-to-Learn Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29-58.
  5. Barbour, M., Kromrei, H., McLaren, A., Toker, S., Mani, N., & Wilson, V. (2009). Testing an assumption of the potential of homemade PowerPoint games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Norfolk, VA.
  6. Barbour, M., Thomas, G., Rauscher, D., & Rieber, L. (2010). Homemade PowerPoint Games. In A. Hirumi (Ed.), Playing Games in Schools (pp. 333-347). Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in
  7. Clesson, K., Adams, M., & Barbour, M.K. (2007). Game design as an educational pedagogy. Paper presented at the National Association of Laboratory Schools Symposium, Johnson City, TN.
  8. Collins, M.A.J. (2000). Do microthemes improve student learning of biology. Paper presented at the National Science Teachers Association National Convention, Orlando, FL.
  9. Gough, N. (1993). Environmental education, narrative complexity and postmodern science/fiction. International Journal of Science Education, 15(5), 607-625.
  10. Harper, K., Etkina, E., & Lin, Y. (2003). Encouraging and analyzing student questions in a large physics course: Meaningful patterns for instructors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 776-791.
  11. Herring, J.E. (2010). School Students, Question Formulation and Issues of Transfer: a Constructivist Grounded Analysis. Libri (København), 60(3), 218-229.
  12. Hirumi, A., Appelman, B., Rieber, L.P., & Van Eck, R. (2010). Preparing instructional designers for game-based learning: Part 2. TechTrends, 54(4), 19-27.
  13. Kafai, Y., Ching, C.C., & Marshall, S. (1997). Children as designers of educational multimedia software. Computers in Education, 29(2), 117-126.
  14. Kafai, Y., Peppler, K.A., & Chiu, G.M. (2007). High Tech Programmers in Low-Income Communities: Creating a Computer Culture in a Community Technology Center. In C. Steinfield, B.T. Pentland, M. Ackerman& N. Contractor (Eds.), Communities and Technologies 2007 (pp. 545-563): Springer London.
  15. Kenny, R., & Gunter, G. (2011). Factors Affecting Adoption of VideoGames in the Classroom. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 22(2), 259-276.
  16. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
  17. Lotherington, H., & Ronda, N.S. (2010). Gaming geography: Educational games and literacy development in the Grade 4 classroom. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(3).
  18. Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19.
  19. Papert, S. (1991). Situating Constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  20. Parker, J.S. (2004). Evaluating the impact of project based learning by using student created PowerPoint games in the seventh grade language arts classroom. Instructional Technology Monographs, 1. Retrieved from Rice, J.W. (2006). New media resistance: Barriers to implementation of computer videogames in the classroom. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting 2006, San Francisco, CA.
  21. Rieber, L.P., Barbour, M.K., Thomas, G.B., & Rauscher, D. (2008). Learning by designing games: Homemade PowerPoint games. In C.T. Miller (Ed.), Games: Their purposes and potential in education (pp. 23-42).
  22. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221.
  23. Siko, J.P., Barbour, M.K., & Toker, S. (2011). Beyond Jeopardy and lectures: Using Microsoft PowerPoint as a game design tool to teach science. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(3), 302Squire, K. (2006). From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19-29.
  24. Sung, K., Shirley, P., & Rosenberg, B.R. (2007). Experiencing aspects of games programming in an introductory computer graphics class. SIGCSE Bull., 39(1), 249-253.
  25. Wong, B.Y. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227-268.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact