You are here:

Effects of the Use of the Blog and Discussion Board on Online Teaching and Learning
PROCEEDINGS

, , California State Univ. San Bernardino, United States ; , Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-92-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper reports on the findings of a study conducted in two courses. The research questions were: (1) To what extent did the use of the Blog and Discussion Board support online teaching and learning? and (2) How could the Blog and Discussion Board be effectively used for online teaching and learning? The data collected for the research project consisted of data from students and from the instructor. The data from the students were survey data with Likert scale questions and open-ended questions; the data from the instructor were the instructor’s journaling that were conducted throughout the quarter. Statistical analysis and content analysis were used to analyze the data.

Citation

Leh, A.S.C., Kremling, J. & Nakayama, M. (2012). Effects of the Use of the Blog and Discussion Board on Online Teaching and Learning. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 574-579). Austin, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 6, 2021 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. An, Y.J., Aworuwa, B., Ballard, G., and Williams, K. (2009). Teaching with Web 2.0 Technologies: Benefits, Barriers and Best Practices, AECT Annual Proceedings, 1, 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.aect.org/pdf/proceedings09/2009/09_1.pdf Brown, J.S., & Adler, R.P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 17-32.
  2. Connell, S. (2010). Comparing blogs, wikis, and discussion boards as collaborative learning tools. Retrieved from http://www.citeulike.org/user/jryall/article/356516 Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. ELearn Magazine, Retrieved from http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?article=291&section=articles
  3. Hoffman, E. (2009). Designing for affect: The potential of social networking for teacher education, AECT Annual Proceedings, 1, 168-176, Retrieved from http://www.aect.org/pdf/proceedings09/2009/09_23.pdf JISC. (2007). In their own words: Exploring the learner's perspective on e-learning (Internet). Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
  4. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or it? First steps towards understanding the net generation. In D. Oblinger& J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 10-29): Educause.
  5. O’Connor-Petruso, S. & Rosenfeld, B. (2009). Web 2.0: What works– and what doesn’t – Experience from the trenches, AECT Annual Proceedings, 1, 370-375, Retrieved from http://www.aect.org/pdf/proceedings09/2009/09_45.pdf Prensky, M. (2005). Engage me or enrage me: What today's learners demand. Educause Review, 40(5), 60-65.
  6. Richardson, W. (2009). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  7. Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. The Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 19-48. Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/ San Millan Maurino, P. (2007). Looking for critical thinking in online threaded discussions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 241-260. Retrieved from http://baywood.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&eissn=1541-3810

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read