You are here:

Wizard-of-Oz-Driven Bootstrapping of a Socially Intelligent Tutoring Strategy
PROCEEDINGS

, , Slovak University of Technology, Slovakia (Slovak Republic)

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Lisbon, Portugal ISBN 978-1-880094-89-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

This research investigates ways to bootstrap a socially intelligent tutoring agent using a Wizard-of-Oz design in which human teachers work as wizards. Students work in an interactive learning environment featuring problem solving and course notes activities, in either individual or group mode. They interact with the agent during off-task dialogs. This paper explores the effort needed on the part of classroom teachers in order to bootstrap an automated agent that can execute near-optimal tutoring actions within the environment. The proposed bootstrapping method can detect peers who will be able to interact well socially. It can balance individual and social activities for students. Consequently, an automated tutor assisted by classroom teachers, rather than costly expert modeling, can be deployed in interactive learning environments in order to supplement and add to the attention a teacher is able to give students.

Citation

Tvarožek, J. & Bieliková, M. (2011). Wizard-of-Oz-Driven Bootstrapping of a Socially Intelligent Tutoring Strategy. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2011--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3635-3644). Lisbon, Portugal: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Sewall, J. & Koedinger, K.R. (2006). The Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT): Preliminary Evaluation of Efficiency Gains. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 61 – 70), Taiwan, Springer.
  2. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communications. In J. Bryant, & D. Zillman (Eds.). Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 121-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  3. Bloom, B.S. (1984). The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as Oneto-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), pp. 4 – 16.
  4. Dohn, N. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), pp. 343 – 363.
  5. Kim, K.J. (2009). Motivational Challenges of Adult Learners in Self-Directed e-Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(3), 317-335. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  6. Kim, Y. (2003). Things that Make Agent as Learning Companion Effective. In A. Rossett (Ed.), Proceedings of
  7. Proctor, C. (1984). Teacher expectations: A model for school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, pp. 469 – 481.
  8. Rovai, A., Ponton, M., Wighting, M. & Baker, J. (2007). A Comparative Analysis of Student Motivation in Traditional Classroom and E-Learning Courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(3), 413-432.
  9. Šimko, M., Barla, M. & Bieliková, M. (2010). ALEF: A Framework for Adaptive Web-Based Learning 2.0. In Proceedings of IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 324/2010, (pp. 367 – 378),
  10. Towner, T.L. & Muñoz, L.C. (2010). Let’ s ‘ Face ’ It: Facebook as an Educational Tool for College Students. In:
  11. Zuckerberg, M. (2010). 500 Million Stories. July 21, 2010.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides